Literature DB >> 16912559

Early oral nutrition after major upper gastrointestinal surgery: why not?

Kristoffer Lassen1, Arthur Revhaug.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To examine the available documentation addressing the introduction of early food after major upper gastrointestinal surgery. RECENT
FINDINGS: No high-quality trials, recent or old, have addressed this topic. A few attempts have been identified. Information is extracted from papers discussing other topics of postoperative care in this field. Generally, nasogastric tubes and nil-by-mouth prevail in the early postoperative period.
SUMMARY: The reluctance to allow early food at will is not evidence based, but neither is the safety of an alternative regimen. Early food at will should probably be allowed after hepatic resections, gastric resections, and total gastrectomies and maybe also after pancreaticoduodenectomies. Resections of the esophagus remain the most challenging issue. The need is urgent for high-powered and high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16912559     DOI: 10.1097/01.mco.0000241673.17300.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care        ISSN: 1363-1950            Impact factor:   4.294


  10 in total

1.  Feasibility study of early oral intake after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Jo; Oh Jeong; Jang Won Sun; Mi Ran Jeong; Seong Yeop Ryu; Young Kyu Park
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.720

Review 2.  Strategies to reduce pulmonary complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Teus J Weijs; Jelle P Ruurda; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Misha D P Luyer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Effect of Electroactive Water Solutions on Homeostasis and Healing Processes of Intestinal Anastomosis Combined with Simulated Anemia in Wistar Rats.

Authors:  S G Gorelik; S A Kolesnikov; A A Zheludev; Y A Parkhisenko; V V Bulynin
Journal:  Arch Razi Inst       Date:  2021-10-31

4.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer complicated with bleeding and/or stenosis: short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Tatyana V Khorobrykh; Nuriddin M Abdulkhakimov; Vadim G Agadzhanov; Davit L Aghayan; Airazat M Kazaryan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.253

5.  Early versus the traditional start of oral intake following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Xiang Mei; Guan-Biao Liang; Lei Dai; Yong-Yong Wang; Ming-Wu Chen; Jun-Xian Mo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.359

6.  Study protocol for the nutritional route in oesophageal resection trial: a single-arm feasibility trial (NUTRIENT trial).

Authors:  Teus J Weijs; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Jelle P Ruurda; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Camiel Rosman; Meindert Sosef; Richard V Hillegersberg; Misha D P Luyer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Feasibility and outcomes of early oral feeding after total gastrectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Marek Sierzega; Ryszard Choruz; Szymon Pietruszka; Piotr Kulig; Piotr Kolodziejczyk; Jan Kulig
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Level of ERAS understanding affects practitioners' practice and perception of early postoperative resumption of oral intake: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Huizhen Huang; Yuelun Zhang; Le Shen; Yuguang Huang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 9.  Optimal timing and route of nutritional support after esophagectomy: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Richard Zheng; Courtney L Devin; Michael J Pucci; Adam C Berger; Ernest L Rosato; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Effects of a stepwise, local patient-specific early oral feeding schedule after gastric cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study from China.

Authors:  Ji Chen; Ming Xu; Yunpeng Zhang; Chun Gao; Peng Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.