Literature DB >> 16911905

Selecting patients for discussion of the ICD as primary prevention for sudden death in heart failure.

Lynne Warner Stevenson1, Akshay S Desai.   

Abstract

This clinical perspective addresses the practical aspects of the decision to implant an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention of sudden death in patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, based on a distillation of recent trial experience. Potentially eligible patients are selected on the basis of left ventricular ejection fraction < 30% to 35% and anticipated survival with good functional capacity beyond 1 year. Communication with these patients focuses on a horizon of 5 years, during which for every 100 patients receiving devices, approximately 30 patients are predicted to die with or without an ICD, while 7 to 8 lives may be saved with the ICD. These estimates are presented in the context of adverse events, including unnecessary shocks, and the possibility that circumstances may arise for which the defibrillator may be inactivated to allow natural death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16911905     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  12 in total

1.  Patients' perspectives on end-of-life issues and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Patricia H Strachan; Sandra L Carroll; Sonya de Laat; Lisa Schwartz; Heather M Arthur
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 2.  CRT or CRT-D devices? The case for 'high energy' devices.

Authors:  Leslie A Saxon; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Left-ventricular power-to-mass ratio at peak exercise predicts mortality, heart failure, and cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease: data from the Heart and Soul Study.

Authors:  Ramin Farzaneh-Far; Beeya Na; Mary A Whooley; Nelson B Schiller
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 1.869

4.  Changing nature of cardiac interventions in older adults.

Authors:  John A Dodson; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Aging health       Date:  2011-04

5.  Patient expectations from implantable defibrillators to prevent death in heart failure.

Authors:  Garrick C Stewart; Joanne R Weintraub; Parakash P Pratibhu; Marc J Semigran; Janice M Camuso; Kimberly Brooks; Sui W Tsang; Mary Susan Anello; Viviane T Nguyen; Eldrin F Lewis; Anju Nohria; Akshay S Desai; Michael M Givertz; Lynne W Stevenson
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 6.  Value of The Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator (WCD) as a Bridging-Therapy before Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD).

Authors:  Priv Doz; Johannes Sperzel
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 7.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implementation in acute heart failure syndromes: unanswered questions.

Authors:  Norman C Wang; Jonathan P Piccini; Mihai Gheorghiade
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 8.  Life-saving devices reach the end of life with heart failure.

Authors:  Daniel D Matlock; Lynne Warner Stevenson
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

9.  Short-term mortality and cost associated with cardiac device implantation in patients hospitalized with heart failure.

Authors:  Jason Swindle; Thomas E Burroughs; Mark A Schnitzler; Paul J Hauptman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 10.  Incorporating the patient perspective: a critical review of clinical practice guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  Kerry E Joyce; Stephen Lord; Daniel D Matlock; Janet M McComb; Richard Thomson
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.