Literature DB >> 16911722

The origin of MDMA (ecstasy) revisited: the true story reconstructed from the original documents.

Roland W Freudenmann1, Florian Oxler, Sabine Bernschneider-Reif.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the origin of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy). The most commonly repeated statement in the medical literature is that MDMA was synthesized by the German pharmaceutical company Merck in 1912 in order to develop an appetite suppressor. AIM: To reconstruct the true story of the first known description of MDMA at Merck using the original documents.
METHODS: A systematic analysis of the original documents in Merck's historical archive in Darmstadt, Germany, was conducted (years 1900-60).
RESULTS: There were no indications for plans to develop an appetite suppressant at Merck between 1900 and 1960. Although MDMA was, in fact, first synthesized at Merck in 1912, it was not tested pharmacologically because it was only an unimportant precursor in a new synthesis for haemostatic substances. The new pathway was patented in order to evade an existing patent by a local competitor. MDMA was called "Methylsafrylamin" in 1912. In 1927 and 1959, the pharmacological effects of MDMA were studied at Merck, but not in humans. DISCUSSION: A systematic analysis of the original documents in the company's archive revealed that uncritical copy-paste procedures may have contributed to the famous myth that MDMA was patented as an appetite suppressor in 1912.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16911722     DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01511.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  25 in total

Review 1.  Bath salts and synthetic cathinones: an emerging designer drug phenomenon.

Authors:  Christopher L German; Annette E Fleckenstein; Glen R Hanson
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 2.  Pharmacology of stimulants prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).

Authors:  J R Docherty
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Synthetic cathinones ("bath salts").

Authors:  Matthew L Banks; Travis J Worst; Daniel E Rusyniak; Jon E Sprague
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 4.  Dark Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine.

Authors:  Lee E Dunlap; Anne M Andrews; David E Olson
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 5.  Clinical applications of hallucinogens: A review.

Authors:  Albert Garcia-Romeu; Brennan Kersgaard; Peter H Addy
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Putting the MD back into MDMA.

Authors:  David J Nutt; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 7.  Lost in translation: preclinical studies on 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine provide information on mechanisms of action, but do not allow accurate prediction of adverse events in humans.

Authors:  A R Green; M V King; S E Shortall; K C F Fone
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 8.  Actions of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) on cerebral dopaminergic, serotonergic and cholinergic neurons.

Authors:  Gary A Gudelsky; Bryan K Yamamoto
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 9.  Molecular and cellular mechanisms of ecstasy-induced neurotoxicity: an overview.

Authors:  João Paulo Capela; Helena Carmo; Fernando Remião; Maria Lourdes Bastos; Andreas Meisel; Félix Carvalho
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 10.  Progress and promise for the MDMA drug development program.

Authors:  Allison A Feduccia; Julie Holland; Michael C Mithoefer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.