Literature DB >> 16911680

Comparison of the efficacy of rabeprazole 10 mg and omeprazole 20 mg for the healing rapidity of peptic ulcer diseases.

Sangwon Ji1, Hyun Soo Kim, Jae Woo Kim, Myeong Kwan Jee, Kwang Wha Park, Young Uh, Dong Ki Lee, Jae Suk Song, Soon Koo Baik, Sang Ok Kwon.   

Abstract

AIM: Rabeprazole has been known to inhibit H(+)/K(+)-ATPase more rapidly than omeprazole, the prototype proton pump inhibitor (PPI). The aim of this study was to demonstrate equivalence between low-dose rabeprazole 10 mg and omeprazole 20 mg for the healing rapidity of active peptic ulcer and for improvement of symptoms. Also, the effect of CYP2C19 genotypes on ulcer healing rapidity was investigated.
METHODS: A total of 112 patients with active peptic ulcer were randomized to receive either rabeprazole 10 mg q.d. or omeprazole 20 mg q.d. for 6 weeks. The remaining ratios (%) and complete healing of the ulcer were determined by endoscopy at 1 week and 6 weeks of treatment. The severity of ulcer pain was also investigated during treatment. CYP2C19 genotype was determined by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method.
RESULTS: The remaining ratio of peptic ulcers after 1 week and the complete healing rate after 6 weeks in the rabeprazole versus omeprazole group were 45.5% versus 50.3% (P = 0.475) and 80.6% versus 87.0% (P = 0.423), respectively. CYP2C19 genotypes had no effect on the remaining ratio of peptic ulcers after 1 week and the healing rate of peptic ulcers after 6 weeks in both groups. The proportions of patients with symptom improvement or resolution were comparable between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Low-dose rabeprazole 10 mg has a similar efficacy for the healing rapidity of active peptic ulcer disease and symptom improvement compared with standard-dose omeprazole 20 mg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16911680     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04314.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  8 in total

Review 1.  Proton pump inhibitors: an update of their clinical use and pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Shaojun Shi; Ulrich Klotz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Acid peptic diseases: pharmacological approach to treatment.

Authors:  Alex Mejia; Walter K Kraft
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.045

3.  Half-dose rabeprazole has an equal efficacy to standard-dose rabeprazole on endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcer.

Authors:  Hong Jun Park; Hyun-Soo Kim; Bo Ra Kim; So Yeon Park; Jin Heon Hong; Ki Won Jo; Jae Woo Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Rabeprazole: a review of its use in the management of gastric acid-related diseases in adults.

Authors:  Claudine M Baldwin; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Effect of ilaprazole on the healing of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcer: randomized-controlled, multicenter study.

Authors:  Chang Seok Bang; Woon Geon Shin; Seung In Seo; Min Ho Choi; Hyun Joo Jang; Se Woo Park; Sea Hyub Kae; Young Joo Yang; Suk Pyo Shin; Gwang Ho Baik; Hak Yang Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The effect of early Helicobacter pylori eradication on the healing of ESD-induced artificial ulcers: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Wen Chong Song; Xiao Feng Wang; Wei Wei Lv; Xiao Yan Xu; De Min Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  A review of rabeprazole in the treatment of acid-related diseases.

Authors:  Fabio Pace; Stefano Pallotta; Stefania Casalini; Gabriele Bianchi Porro
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Xu Shu; Zhenhua Zhu; Yu Fu; Zhenyu Zhang; Jiangbin Wang; Xing Li; Shuixiang He; Huizhen Fan; Side Liu; Guoxin Zhang; Jianhua Tang; Caibin Huang; Qin Du; Xiaoyan Wang; Baohong Xu; Yiqi Du; Qikui Chen; Bangmao Wang; Ying Chen; Xianghui Duan; Yong Xie; Lijuan Huo; Xiaohua Hou; Nonghua Lu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.