| Literature DB >> 16911551 |
I Scott1, P Greenberg, P Poole, D Campbell.
Abstract
This is the second in a series of articles emphasizing the cautions in the interpretation of health-care studies. Systematic reviews are presented as comprehensive, unbiased summaries of evidence and are often referred to by clinicians, guideline developers and health policy-makers. Their strengths and limitations, and how their results can be subject to bias and misinterpretation, are discussed.Mesh：
Year: 2006 PMID： 16911551 DOI： 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01140.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intern Med J ISSN： 1444-0903 Impact factor: 2.048