Literature DB >> 16911454

Apes' and children's understanding of cooperative and competitive motives in a communicative situation.

Esther Herrmann1, Michael Tomasello.   

Abstract

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) (Study 1) and 18- and 24-month-old human children (Study 2) participated in a novel communicative task. A human experimenter (E) hid food or a toy in one of two opaque containers before gesturing towards the reward's location in one of two ways. In the Informing condition, she attempted to help the subject find the hidden object by simply pointing to the correct container. In the Prohibiting condition, E held out her arm toward the correct container (palm out) and told the subject firmly 'Don't take this one.' As in previous studies, the apes were at chance in the Informing condition. However, they were above chance in the new Prohibiting condition. Human 18-month-olds showed this same pattern of results, whereas 24-month-olds showed the opposite pattern: they were better in the Informing condition than in the Prohibiting condition. In our interpretation, success in the Prohibiting condition requires subjects to understand E's goal toward them and their behavior, and then to make an inference (she would only prohibit if there were something good in there). Success in the Informing condition requires subjects to understand a cooperative communicative motive - which apparently apes and young infants find difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16911454     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00519.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  21 in total

Review 1.  Primates' Socio-Cognitive Abilities: What Kind of Comparisons Makes Sense?

Authors:  Jill T Byrnit
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2015-09

2.  What influences a pet dog's first impression of a stranger?

Authors:  Jingzhi Tan; Kara K Walker; Katherine Hoff; Brian Hare
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Convergent minds: ostension, inference and Grice's third clause.

Authors:  Richard Moore
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Dogs (Canis familiaris) account for body orientation but not visual barriers when responding to pointing gestures.

Authors:  Evan L MacLean; Christopher Krupenye; Brian Hare
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes) coordinate by communicating in a collaborative problem-solving task.

Authors:  Alicia P Melis; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  A natural history of the human mind: tracing evolutionary changes in brain and cognition.

Authors:  Chet C Sherwood; Francys Subiaul; Tadeusz W Zawidzki
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Bonobos (Pan paniscus) show an attentional bias toward conspecifics' emotions.

Authors:  Mariska E Kret; Linda Jaasma; Thomas Bionda; Jasper G Wijnen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Tolerant Barbary macaques maintain juvenile levels of social attention in old age, but despotic rhesus macaques do not.

Authors:  Alexandra G Rosati; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Dogs (Canis familiaris), but not chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), understand imperative pointing.

Authors:  Katharina C Kirchhofer; Felizitas Zimmermann; Juliane Kaminski; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The evolutionary origins of natural pedagogy: Rhesus monkeys show sustained attention following nonsocial cues versus social communicative signals.

Authors:  Rosemary Bettle; Alexandra G Rosati
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2020-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.