Literature DB >> 16910799

Cost and utilization outcomes of patients receiving hospital-based palliative care consultation.

Joan D Penrod1, Partha Deb, Carol Luhrs, Cornelia Dellenbaugh, Carolyn W Zhu, Tsivia Hochman, Matthew L Maciejewski, Evelyn Granieri, R Sean Morrison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare per diem total direct, ancillary (laboratory and radiology) and pharmacy costs of palliative care (PC) compared to usual care (UC) patients during a terminal hospitalization; to examine the association between PC and ICU admission.
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cost analysis using a VA (payer) perspective.
SETTING: Two urban VA medical centers. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic and health characteristics of 314 veterans admitted during two years were obtained from VA administrative data. Hospital costs came from the VA cost accounting system. ANALYSIS: Generalized linear models (GLM) were estimated for total direct, ancillary and pharmacy costs. Predictors included patient age, principal diagnosis, comorbidity, whether patient stay was medical or surgical, site and whether the patient was seen by the palliative care consultation team. A probit regression was used to analyze probability of ICU admission. Propensity score matching was used to improve balance in observed covariates.
RESULTS: PC patients were 42 percentage points (95% CI, -56% [corrected] to -31%) less likely to be admitted to ICU. Total direct costs per day were $239 (95% CI, -387 to -122) lower and ancillary costs were $98 (95% CI, -133 to -57) lower than costs for UC patients. There was no difference in pharmacy costs. The results were similar using propensity score matching.
CONCLUSION: PC was associated with significantly lower likelihood of ICU use and lower inpatient costs compared to UC. Our findings coupled with those indicating better patient and family outcomes with PC suggest both a cost and quality incentive for hospitals to develop PC programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16910799     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  74 in total

1.  Increased access to palliative care and hospice services: opportunities to improve value in health care.

Authors:  Diane E Meier
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  The use of hospital-based services by heart failure patients in the last year of life: a discussion paper.

Authors:  Gursharan K Singh; Patricia M Davidson; Peter S Macdonald; Phillip J Newton
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  The role of palliative care in population management and accountable care organizations.

Authors:  Grant Smith; Rachelle Bernacki; Susan D Block
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 4.  End-of-life considerations in older patients who have lung disease.

Authors:  Renee D Stapleton; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.878

5.  The challenge of selection bias and confounding in palliative care research.

Authors:  Helene Starks; Paula Diehr; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Better care, better bottom line for hospitals.

Authors:  R Sean Morrison
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-12-05

7.  Research methods priorities in geriatric palliative medicine.

Authors:  Melissa D Aldridge Carlson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  1-2-3 Project: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Normalize and Systematize Palliative Care for All Patients With Cancer in the Outpatient Clinic Setting.

Authors:  Anjali V Desai; Virginia M Klimek; Kimberly Chow; Andrew S Epstein; Camila Bernal; Kelly Anderson; Molly Okpako; Robin Rawlins-Duell; Dana Kramer; Danielle Romano; Jessica I Goldberg; Judith E Nelson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Improving access to hospice care: informing the debate.

Authors:  Melissa D A Carlson; R Sean Morrison; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 10.  The value of data collection within a palliative care program.

Authors:  Arif H Kamal; David C Currow; Christine Ritchie; Janet Bull; Jane L Wheeler; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.