Literature DB >> 16909566

The questionable effectiveness of science spending by international conservation organizations in the tropics.

David Cleary1.   

Abstract

The general context of conservation in the tropics--in the Amazon basin and elsewhere--is stagnant or declining funding and rapidly growing threat levels. For conservation programs this makes strategic deployment of limited conservation resources all the more important. International conservation organizations active in the tropics increasingly define themselves as science driven and expend considerable resources on science-based activities such as ecoregional analysis, field research, and monitoring of ecological variables. l argue that an overemphasis on science has generated a series of unintended but serious problems for conservation in the tropics. Spending on monitoring and ecoregional analysis has effectively starved protection and threat analysis of resources. A decoupling of biology from serious cost-benefit analysis has led to the privileging of small-scale and local analyses, rather than the systemic analyses essential for the strategic allocation of scarce conservation resources. Successful conservation in the tropics depends on the crossing of biogeography with sophisticated threat analysis to identify priority geographies for protection. This should be combined with much more systematic engagement with the principal drivers of tropical deforestation, especially agribusiness. Caution and a sense of proportion are required when balancing the financial demands of science and those of protection. I suggest that conservation organizations should cooperate far more in assembling and analyzing information on conservation spending and on threat levels and biogeography at the continental, national, and regional levels. Site selection should follow rather than precede this kind of strategic analysis, and sites should be considered elements of a network rather than stand-alone projects. More attention should be paid to market-driven conservation through techniques such as certification and responsible supply-chain management.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16909566     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00413.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  4 in total

1.  Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines.

Authors:  Anthony Waldron; Arne O Mooers; Daniel C Miller; Nate Nibbelink; David Redding; Tyler S Kuhn; J Timmons Roberts; John L Gittleman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The value of validated vulnerability data for conservation planning in rapidly changing landscapes.

Authors:  Emily Sherra Weeks; Susan Walker; Jake McC Overton; Bruce Clarkson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Optimizing occupancy surveys by maximizing detection probability: application to amphibian monitoring in the Mediterranean region.

Authors:  Maud Petitot; Nicolas Manceau; Philippe Geniez; Aurélien Besnard
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Conserving biodiversity efficiently: what to do, where, and when.

Authors:  Kerrie A Wilson; Emma C Underwood; Scott A Morrison; Kirk R Klausmeyer; William W Murdoch; Belinda Reyers; Grant Wardell-Johnson; Pablo A Marquet; Phil W Rundel; Marissa F McBride; Robert L Pressey; Michael Bode; Jon M Hoekstra; Sandy Andelman; Michael Looker; Carlo Rondinini; Peter Kareiva; M Rebecca Shaw; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.029

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.