Literature DB >> 16909553

Political science and conservation biology: a dialog of the deaf.

Arun Agrawal1, Elinor Ostrom.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16909553     DOI： 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00468.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN： 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  The User, not the Tool: Perceptions of Credibility and Relevance Affect the Uptake of Prioritisation.

Authors:  Milena Kiatkoski Kim; Louisa Evans; Lea M Scherl; Helene Marsh
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Global marine protection targets: how S.M.A.R.T are they?

Authors:  Louisa Wood
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  The case for policy-relevant conservation science.

Authors:  David C Rose
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Species, habitats, society: an evaluation of research supporting EU's Natura 2000 network.

Authors:  Viorel D Popescu; Laurentiu Rozylowicz; Iulian M Niculae; Adina L Cucu; Tibor Hartel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy.

Authors:  Nadine Marshall; Neil Adger; Simon Attwood; Katrina Brown; Charles Crissman; Christopher Cvitanovic; Cassandra De Young; Margaret Gooch; Craig James; Sabine Jessen; Dave Johnson; Paul Marshall; Sarah Park; Dave Wachenfeld; Damian Wrigley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.