Literature DB >> 16908646

Effect of refined soy oil or whole soybeans on intake, methane output, and performance of young bulls.

E Jordan1, D Kenny, M Hawkins, R Malone, D K Lovett, F P O'Mara.   

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to establish the effects of feeding refined soy oil (RSO) or whole soybeans (WSB) containing soy oil on DMI, animal performance, and enteric methane (CH4) emissions in young bulls. Thirty-six Charolais and Limousin cross-bred, young beef bulls (338 +/- 27 kg of BW, 218 +/- 17 d of age at the beginning of the experiment) were blocked by BW, age, and breed before being assigned in a randomized complete block design to 1 of 3 experimental treatments (n = 12). The experimental period lasted for 103 d, with enteric CH4 output recorded for 2 periods of 5 consecutive days on d 37 to 41 and d 79 to 83. The 3 dietary treatments consisted of a barley/soybean meal-based concentrate with 0 g/d of RSO; oil from WSB as 6% of DMI (WSB treatment); and oil from RSO as 6% of DMI (RSO treatment). Each diet had a 10:90 forage:concentrate ratio, using barley straw as the forage source. Diet affected DMI (P < or = 0.001) and GE intake (P < 0.05 during the CH4 measurement periods), with the WSB treatment producing the lowest values. The addition of WSB decreased ADG (P < 0.05) compared with the RSO treatment. The WSB treatment also decreased (P < 0.05) average daily carcass gain (ADCG). Both the RSO and WSB concentrates decreased (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001) daily enteric CH4 output when expressed in terms of liters per day, liters per kilogram of DMI, percentage of GE intake, liters per kilogram of ADG, and liters per kilogram of ADCG. Diet had no effect (P = 0.557) on ruminal protozoal numbers. The reductions in enteric CH4 were achieved at relatively high oil inclusion levels. Such oil levels have previously been reported to decrease DMI of high-forage diets, although no effect on DMI was noted with the low-forage diets fed in this experiment. This impact on DMI of high-forage diets may limit the range of diets for which this CH4 reduction strategy may be applicable. The inclusion level of WSB in the current experiment (27%) was beyond the palatability threshold of the bulls used and resulted in a marked decline in intake and performance. Therefore, WSB may have a role to play in ruminant diets, but only at a reduced inclusion rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16908646     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

Review 1.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Daniel Martino; Zucong Cai; Daniel Gwary; Henry Janzen; Pushpam Kumar; Bruce McCarl; Stephen Ogle; Frank O'Mara; Charles Rice; Bob Scholes; Oleg Sirotenko; Mark Howden; Tim McAllister; Genxing Pan; Vladimir Romanenkov; Uwe Schneider; Sirintornthep Towprayoon; Martin Wattenbach; Jo Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions.

Authors:  Amlan Kumar Patra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Microbial fuel cells and microbial ecology: applications in ruminant health and production research.

Authors:  Orianna Bretschger; Jason B Osterstock; William E Pinchak; Shun'ichi Ishii; Karen E Nelson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 4.  Enteric Methane Emissions and Animal Performance in Dairy and Beef Cattle Production: Strategies, Opportunities, and Impact of Reducing Emissions.

Authors:  Byeng-Ryel Min; Seul Lee; Hyunjung Jung; Daniel N Miller; Rui Chen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Chitosan/Calcium-Alginate Encapsulated Flaxseed Oil on Dairy Cattle Diet: In Vitro Fermentation and Fatty Acid Biohydrogenation.

Authors:  Maghsoud Besharati; Ilias Giannenas; Valiollah Palangi; Tugay Ayasan; Fatemeh Noorian; Aristide Maggiolino; Jose Manuel Lorenzo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 6.  Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Sarah E Hook; André-Denis G Wright; Brian W McBride
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.273

7.  Effect of traditional Chinese medicine compounds on rumen fermentation, methanogenesis and microbial flora in vitro.

Authors:  Shui Ping Wang; Wen Juan Wang; Zhi Liang Tan; Guo Wei Liu; Cheng Fu Zhou; Meng Jie Yin
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2018-10-25

8.  Feed Intake, Methane Emissions, Milk Production and Rumen Methanogen Populations of Grazing Dairy Cows Supplemented with Various C 18 Fatty Acid Sources.

Authors:  Tommy M Boland; Karina M Pierce; Alan K Kelly; David A Kenny; Mary B Lynch; Sinéad M Waters; Stephen J Whelan; Zoe C McKay
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The benefits of supplementary fat in feed rations for ruminants with particular focus on reducing levels of methane production.

Authors:  J Rasmussen; A Harrison
Journal:  ISRN Vet Sci       Date:  2011-08-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.