OBJECTIVE: 22q11 deletion syndrome, a common human interstitial deletion syndrome (1:5000), is associated with a heterogeneous physical phenotype, including several factors that markedly increase the risk for olfactory disorder. Despite its potential consequences, pediatric studies of impaired olfaction are rare, and odor detection in children with 22q11 deletion syndrome has not yet been examined. METHODS: The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test was administered to 62 children, including 39 with 22q11 deletion syndrome and 23 neurotypical control siblings who ranged in age from 5.3 to 14.8 years. Lowered smell detection accuracy among affected children was predicted. RESULTS: Substantially more children with 22q11 deletion syndrome (68%) as compared with neurotypical control subjects (13%) had University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test scores > or = 2 SDs below the standardization sample mean. Frequency of impairment in younger versus older children did not differ. The score distributions of children with and without velopharyngeal insufficiency did not differ; however, markedly lower score variance among children with velopharyngeal insufficiency suggested its negative impact on olfaction. Posthoc error analyses revealed that affected children had special difficulty detecting smells that are associated with fumes and smoke. CONCLUSIONS: Odor detection failures are ubiquitous among children with 22q11 deletion syndrome and are not associated with developmental delay or performance characteristics of younger affected children. Additional studies are needed to examine further the impact on olfaction of velopharyngeal insufficiency and compromised nasal airway patency. Children with 22q11 deletion syndrome should be evaluated routinely for olfactory disorder. When deficits are identified, caregivers should be warned of potential dangers that are associated with this type of sensory impairment.
OBJECTIVE: 22q11 deletion syndrome, a common human interstitial deletion syndrome (1:5000), is associated with a heterogeneous physical phenotype, including several factors that markedly increase the risk for olfactory disorder. Despite its potential consequences, pediatric studies of impaired olfaction are rare, and odor detection in children with 22q11 deletion syndrome has not yet been examined. METHODS: The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test was administered to 62 children, including 39 with 22q11 deletion syndrome and 23 neurotypical control siblings who ranged in age from 5.3 to 14.8 years. Lowered smell detection accuracy among affected children was predicted. RESULTS: Substantially more children with 22q11 deletion syndrome (68%) as compared with neurotypical control subjects (13%) had University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test scores > or = 2 SDs below the standardization sample mean. Frequency of impairment in younger versus older children did not differ. The score distributions of children with and without velopharyngeal insufficiency did not differ; however, markedly lower score variance among children with velopharyngeal insufficiency suggested its negative impact on olfaction. Posthoc error analyses revealed that affected children had special difficulty detecting smells that are associated with fumes and smoke. CONCLUSIONS: Odor detection failures are ubiquitous among children with 22q11 deletion syndrome and are not associated with developmental delay or performance characteristics of younger affected children. Additional studies are needed to examine further the impact on olfaction of velopharyngeal insufficiency and compromised nasal airway patency. Children with 22q11 deletion syndrome should be evaluated routinely for olfactory disorder. When deficits are identified, caregivers should be warned of potential dangers that are associated with this type of sensory impairment.
Authors: A K Anderson; K Christoff; I Stappen; D Panitz; D G Ghahremani; G Glover; J D E Gabrieli; N Sobel Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: A E Pulver; G Nestadt; R Goldberg; R J Shprintzen; M Lamacz; P S Wolyniec; B Morrow; M Karayiorgou; S E Antonarakis; D Housman Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Lorenzo D Botto; Kristin May; Paul M Fernhoff; Adolfo Correa; Karlene Coleman; Sonja A Rasmussen; Robert K Merritt; Leslie A O'Leary; Lee-Yang Wong; E Marsha Elixson; William T Mahle; Robert M Campbell Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Martin Schecklmann; Christina Schwenck; Regina Taurines; Christine Freitag; Andreas Warnke; Manfred Gerlach; Marcel Romanos Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Maureen A May; Carla A Sanchez; Frederic W B Deleyiannis; Mary L Marazita; Seth M Weinberg Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Sunny X Tang; Paul J Moberg; James J Yi; Andrew S Wiemken; Erich M Dress; Tyler M Moore; Monica E Calkins; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Elaine H Zackai; Beverly S Emanuel; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Bruce I Turetsky Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Beverly A Karpinski; Thomas M Maynard; Matthew S Fralish; Samer Nuwayhid; Irene E Zohn; Sally A Moody; Anthony-S LaMantia Journal: Dis Model Mech Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 5.758