BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: [(11)C]Methionine (MET) PET imaging is a sensitive technique for visualizing primary brain tumors and recurrence/progression after therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the uptake of MET and histopathologic grading and to investigate the prognostic value of the tracer, in both settings. METHODS: Cerebral uptake of MET was determined in 52 patients: in 26 patients for primary staging (group A) and 26 patients with suspected brain tumor recurrence/progression after therapy (group B). Semiquantitative methionine uptake indices (UI) defined by the tumor (maximum)-to-background ratio was correlated with tumor grade and final outcome. RESULTS: Overall median survival was 34.9 months. MET showed pathologically increased uptake in 41 of 52 scans. Although a weak linear correlation between MET uptake and grading was observed (R = 0.38, P = .028), analysis of variance showed no significant differences in MET UI between tumor grades for either group A or B. Benign and grade I lesions showed significant difference in MET uptake in comparison with higher grade lesions (P = .006). Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, no thresholds could be found at which MET was predictive for survival. Proportional hazard regression showed that only WHO grading class (low versus high) was predictive of survival (P = .015). CONCLUSION: Interindividual MET uptake variability does not allow noninvasive grading on an individual patient basis. Moreover, there is no significant prognostic value in studying maximal methionine UI in brain tumors. The clinical use of MET should therefore be primarily focused on questions such as detection of recurrence, biopsy guidance, and radiation therapy target volume delineation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: [(11)C]Methionine (MET) PET imaging is a sensitive technique for visualizing primary brain tumors and recurrence/progression after therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the uptake of MET and histopathologic grading and to investigate the prognostic value of the tracer, in both settings. METHODS: Cerebral uptake of MET was determined in 52 patients: in 26 patients for primary staging (group A) and 26 patients with suspected brain tumor recurrence/progression after therapy (group B). Semiquantitative methionine uptake indices (UI) defined by the tumor (maximum)-to-background ratio was correlated with tumor grade and final outcome. RESULTS: Overall median survival was 34.9 months. MET showed pathologically increased uptake in 41 of 52 scans. Although a weak linear correlation between MET uptake and grading was observed (R = 0.38, P = .028), analysis of variance showed no significant differences in MET UI between tumor grades for either group A or B. Benign and grade I lesions showed significant difference in MET uptake in comparison with higher grade lesions (P = .006). Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, no thresholds could be found at which MET was predictive for survival. Proportional hazard regression showed that only WHO grading class (low versus high) was predictive of survival (P = .015). CONCLUSION: Interindividual MET uptake variability does not allow noninvasive grading on an individual patient basis. Moreover, there is no significant prognostic value in studying maximal methionine UI in brain tumors. The clinical use of MET should therefore be primarily focused on questions such as detection of recurrence, biopsy guidance, and radiation therapy target volume delineation.
Authors: S Goldman; M Levivier; B Pirotte; J M Brucher; D Wikler; P Damhaut; S Dethy; J Brotchi; J Hildebrand Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M Weckesser; K J Langen; C H Rickert; S Kloska; R Straeter; K Hamacher; G Kurlemann; H Wassmann; H H Coenen; O Schober Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-01-14 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: J Nuutinen; P Sonninen; P Lehikoinen; E Sutinen; R Valavaara; E Eronen; S Norrgård; J Kulmala; M Teräs; H Minn Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Matthias Weckesser; Peter Matheja; Antje Schwarzrock; Christian H Rickert; Ronald Sträter; Stefan Palkovic; Burkhard Riemann; Klaus Kopka; Peter Lüdemann; Werner Paulus; Hansdetlef Wassmann; Otmar Schober Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: O De Witte; I Goldberg; D Wikler; S Rorive; P Damhaut; M Monclus; I Salmon; J Brotchi; S Goldman Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Gabriele Pöpperl; Friedrich W Kreth; Jan H Mehrkens; Jochen Herms; Klaus Seelos; Walter Koch; Franz J Gildehaus; Hans A Kretzschmar; Jörg C Tonn; Klaus Tatsch Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-09-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Gérard Moulin-Romsée; Eduard D'Hondt; Tjibbe de Groot; Jan Goffin; Raf Sciot; Luc Mortelmans; Johan Menten; Guy Bormans; Koen Van Laere Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-09-01 Impact factor: 9.236