Literature DB >> 16908047

Remediation of heavy metal polluted sediment by suspension and solid-bed leaching: estimate of metal removal efficiency.

Christian Löser1, Andreas Zehnsdorf, Petra Hoffmann, Heinz Seidel.   

Abstract

Remediation of heavy metal polluted sediment by extracting the metals with sulfuric acid can be performed as follows: abiotic suspension leaching, microbial suspension leaching, abiotic solid-bed leaching, and microbial solid-bed leaching. Abiotic leaching means that the acid is directly added, while microbial leaching means that the acid is generated from sulfur by microbes (bioleaching). These four principles were compared to each other with special emphasis on the effectiveness of metal solubilization and metal removal by subsequent washing. Abiotic suspension leaching was fastest, but suspending the solids exhibits some disadvantages (low solid content, costly reactors, permanent input of energy, high water consumption, special equipment required for solid separation, large amounts of waste water, sediment properties hinder reuse), which prevent suspension leaching in practice. Abiotic solid-bed leaching implies the supply of acid by percolating water which proceeds slowly due to a limited bed permeability. Microbial solid-bed leaching means the generation of acid within the bed and has been proven to be the only principle applicable to practice. Metal removal from leached sediment requires washing with water. Washing of solid beds was much more effective than washing of suspended sediment. The kinetics of metal removal from solid beds 0.3, 0.6 or 1.2m in height were similar; when using a percolation flow of 20lm(-2)h(-1), the removal of 98% of the mobile metals lasted 57-61h and required 8.5, 4.2 or 2.3lkg(-1) water. This means, the higher the solid bed, the lower the sediment-mass-specific demand for time and water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16908047     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  4 in total

1.  Metal bioleaching from anaerobic sediments from Reconquista River basin (Argentina) as a potential remediation strategy.

Authors:  Natalia Porzionato; Ana Tufo; Roberto Candal; Gustavo Curutchet
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Study on dealkalization and settling performance of red mud.

Authors:  Muxi Luo; Xuejiao Qi; Yurui Zhang; Yufei Ren; Jiacheng Tong; Zining Chen; Yiming Hou; Nuerxiate Yeerkebai; Hongtao Wang; Shijin Feng; Fengting Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effects of freshwater leaching on potential bioavailability of heavy metals in tidal flat soils.

Authors:  Hui Li; Jun Lu; Qu-Sheng Li; Bao-Yan He; Xiu-Qin Mei; Dan-Ping Yu; Zhi-Min Xu; Shi-Hong Guo; Hui-Jun Chen
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Efficient dealkalization of red mud and recovery of valuable metals by a sulfur-oxidizing bacterium.

Authors:  Duo-Rui Zhang; Hong-Rui Chen; Jin-Lan Xia; Zhen-Yuan Nie; Rui-Yong Zhang; Eva Pakostova
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 6.064

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.