Literature DB >> 16906349

Moral agency in other animals.

Paul Shapiro1.   

Abstract

Some philosophers have argued that moral agency is characteristic of humans alone and that its absence from other animals justifies granting higher moral status to humans. However, human beings do not have a monopoly on moral agency, which admits of varying degrees and does not require mastery of moral principles. The view that all and only humans possess moral agency indicates our underestimation of the mental lives of other animals. Since many other animals are moral agents (to varying degrees), they are also subject to (limited) moral obligations, examples of which are provided in this paper. But, while moral agency is sufficient for significant moral status, it is by no means necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16906349     DOI: 10.1007/s11017-006-9010-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  3 in total

1.  The moral case for experimentation on animals.

Authors:  H J McCloskey
Journal:  Monist       Date:  1987-01

2.  "ALTRUISTIC" BEHAVIOR IN RHESUS MONKEYS.

Authors:  J H MASSERMAN; S WECHKIN; W TERRIS
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1964-12       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Why human beings may use animals.

Authors:  Tibor R Machan
Journal:  J Value Inq       Date:  2002
  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  The problem of many hands: climate change as an example.

Authors:  Ibo van de Poel; Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist; Neelke Doorn; Sjoerd Zwart; Lambèr Royakkers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Shifting the Moral Burden: Expanding Moral Status and Moral Agency.

Authors:  L Syd M Johnson
Journal:  Health Hum Rights       Date:  2021-12

3.  The Mental Homologies of Mammals. Towards an Understanding of Another Mammals World View.

Authors:  Marthe Kiley-Worthington
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.