Literature DB >> 16906081

Results of multiple drilling compared with those of conventional methods of core decompression.

Won Seok Song1, Jeong Joon Yoo, Young-Min Kim, Hee Joong Kim.   

Abstract

We performed multiple drilling as a femoral head-preserving procedure for osteonecrosis of the femoral head thinking the therapeutic effects of core decompression could be achieved by this simpler procedure than core decompression. We retrospectively reviewed 136 patients (163 hips) who had multiple drilling using 9/64-inch Steinmann pins for treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The mean followup for patients who did not require additional surgery (113 hips) was 87 months (range, 60-134 months). We defined failure as the need for additional surgery or a Harris hip score less than 75. After a minimum 5-year followup, 79% (31/39) of patients with Stage I disease and 77% (62/81) of patients with Stage II disease had no additional surgery. All (15/15) small lesions (<25% involvement) and 84% (37/44) of medium-sized lesions (25-50% involvement) were considered successful. Survival rates of patients with Ficat Stages I or II lesions were greater than survival rates for patients with Stage III lesions. Hips with a large necrotic area had poor results. We had one instance of subtrochanteric fracture through drill entry holes. Multiple drilling is straightforward with few complications and produces results comparable to results of other core decompression techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16906081     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000229342.96103.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  37 in total

1.  A current review of core decompression in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Todd P Pierce; Julio J Jauregui; Randa K Elmallah; Carlos J Lavernia; Michael A Mont; James Nace
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-09

2.  Management of non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head-a comparative analysis of the outcome of multiple small diameter drilling and core decompression with fibular grafting.

Authors:  S P Mohanty; K A Singh; R Kundangar; V Shankar
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-10-18

3.  The safety and efficacy of combined autologous concentrated bone marrow grafting and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Hajime Mishima; Hisashi Sugaya; Tomokazu Yoshioka; Katsuya Aoto; Hiroshi Wada; Hiroshi Akaogi; Naoyuki Ochiai
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-02-27

4.  Hemoglobin to Hematocrit Ratio: The Strongest Predictor of Femoral Head Osteonecrosis in Children With Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Douglas Worrall; Kim Smith-Whitley; Lawrence Wells
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  SAS weekly rounds: avascular necrosis.

Authors:  Thomas W Hamilton; Susan M Goodman; Mark Figgie
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-03-18

6.  Umbrella-shaped, memory alloy femoral head support device for treatment of avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Xiaowei Yu; Wenxiong Jiang; Qi Pan; Tianyi Wu; Yan Zhang; Zubin Zhou; Dongpeng Du
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Aseptic osteonecrosis of the hip in the adult: current evidence on conservative treatment.

Authors:  Raymond Klumpp; Carlo Trevisan
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-04-07

Review 8.  Conservative surgery for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: current options.

Authors:  Elena Gasbarra; Fabio Luigi Perrone; Jacopo Baldi; Vincenzo Bilotta; Antimo Moretti; Umbertto Tarantino
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-04-07

9.  Endoscopic and arthroscopic assistance in femoral head core decompression.

Authors:  Luca Pierannunzii
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2012-11-16

Review 10.  Do modern techniques improve core decompression outcomes for hip osteonecrosis?

Authors:  David R Marker; Thorsten M Seyler; Slif D Ulrich; Siddharth Srivastava; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.