BACKGROUND: The recent availability of alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout (GalT-KO) miniature swine has eliminated anti-Gal antibodies as the major barrier to xenotransplantation, potentially bringing this modality closer to clinical application. Highly-allosensitized patients, who have poor prospects of receiving a suitable cross-match negative human organ, might be the first patients to benefit from xenotransplantation of porcine organs. However, concerns exist regarding cross-reactivity of alloreactive anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies against xenogeneic swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) antigens. We have investigated this question using sera from such patients on GalT-KO target cells. METHODS: Using flow cytometry and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assays, we have tested a panel of 88 human serum samples from patients awaiting cadaveric renal allotransplantation for reactivity against: 1) human; 2) standard miniature swine; and 3) GalT-KO peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and cultured endothelial cells. RESULTS: Anti-swine IgM and IgG antibody binding, as well as CDC, were significantly attenuated on GalT-KO versus standard swine. No correlation was found between the degree of anti-human panel reactive antibodies (PRA) and xenoreactivity against either standard or GalT-KO miniature swine. Treatment of sera with dithiothreitol (DTT) showed that the majority of remaining lymphocytotoxicity against GalT-KO swine was mediated by preformed IgM antibodies. Patients with high alloreactivity but low anti-GalT-KO xenoreactivity were readily identified. CONCLUSIONS: Highly allosensitized patients awaiting renal transplants appear to be at no increased risk of xenosensitization over their non-sensitized cohorts, and could therefore be candidates for xenotransplantation using GalT-KO swine donors.
BACKGROUND: The recent availability of alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout (GalT-KO) miniature swine has eliminated anti-Gal antibodies as the major barrier to xenotransplantation, potentially bringing this modality closer to clinical application. Highly-allosensitized patients, who have poor prospects of receiving a suitable cross-match negative human organ, might be the first patients to benefit from xenotransplantation of porcine organs. However, concerns exist regarding cross-reactivity of alloreactive anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies against xenogeneic swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) antigens. We have investigated this question using sera from such patients on GalT-KO target cells. METHODS: Using flow cytometry and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assays, we have tested a panel of 88 human serum samples from patients awaiting cadaveric renal allotransplantation for reactivity against: 1) human; 2) standard miniature swine; and 3) GalT-KO peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and cultured endothelial cells. RESULTS: Anti-swine IgM and IgG antibody binding, as well as CDC, were significantly attenuated on GalT-KO versus standard swine. No correlation was found between the degree of anti-human panel reactive antibodies (PRA) and xenoreactivity against either standard or GalT-KO miniature swine. Treatment of sera with dithiothreitol (DTT) showed that the majority of remaining lymphocytotoxicity against GalT-KO swine was mediated by preformed IgM antibodies. Patients with high alloreactivity but low anti-GalT-KO xenoreactivity were readily identified. CONCLUSIONS: Highly allosensitized patients awaiting renal transplants appear to be at no increased risk of xenosensitization over their non-sensitized cohorts, and could therefore be candidates for xenotransplantation using GalT-KO swine donors.
Authors: Akira Shimizu; Kazuhiko Yamada; Simon C Robson; David H Sachs; Robert B Colvin Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Qi Li; Hidetaka Hara; Zhongqiang Zhang; Michael E Breimer; Yi Wang; David K C Cooper Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2018-04-14 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: A D Griesemer; A Hirakata; A Shimizu; S Moran; A Tena; H Iwaki; Y Ishikawa; P Schule; J S Arn; S C Robson; J A Fishman; M Sykes; D H Sachs; K Yamada Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Bao-Ngoc H Nguyen; Agnes M Azimzadeh; Carsten Schroeder; Thomas Buddensick; Tianshu Zhang; Amal Laaris; Megan Cochrane; Henk-Jan Schuurman; David H Sachs; James S Allan; Richard N Pierson Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2011 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: Fan Liang; Isaac Wamala; Joseph Scalea; Aseda Tena; Taylor Cormack; Shannon Pratts; Raimon Duran-Struuck; Nahel Elias; Martin Hertl; Christene A Huang; David H Sachs Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 3.907