Literature DB >> 16905298

Drug adsorption to plastic containers and retention of drugs in cultured cells under in vitro conditions.

Joni J Palmgrén1, Jukka Mönkkönen, Timo Korjamo, Anssi Hassinen, Seppo Auriola.   

Abstract

Loss of drug content during cell culture transport experiment can lead to misinterpretations in permeability analysis. This study analyses drug adsorption to various plastic containers and drug retention in cultured cells under in vitro conditions. The loss of various drugs to polystyrene tubes and well plates was compared to polypropylene and glass tubes both in deionised water and buffer solution. In cellular uptake experiments, administered drugs were obtained from cultured cells by liquid extraction. Samples were collected at various time points and drug concentrations were measured by a new HPLC-MS/MS method. Acidic drugs (hydrochlorothiazide, naproxen, probenicid, and indomethacin) showed little if any sorption to all tested materials in either water or buffer. In the case of basic drugs, substantial loss to polystyrene tubes and well plates was observed. After 4.5 h, the relative amount remaining in aqueous test solution stored in polystyrene tubes was 64.7 +/- 6.8%, 38.4 +/- 9.1%, 31.9 +/- 6.7%, and 23.5 +/- 6.1% for metoprolol, medetomidine, propranolol, and midazolam, respectively. Interestingly, there was no significant loss of drugs dissolved in buffer to any of the tested materials indicating that buffer reduced surficial interaction. The effect of drug concentration to sorption was also tested. Results indicated that the higher the concentration in the test solution the lower the proportional drug loss, suggesting that the polystyrene contained a limited amount of binding sites. Cellular uptake studies showed considerable retention of drugs in cultured cells. The amounts of absorbed drugs in cellular structures were 0.45%, 4.88%, 13.15%, 43.80%, 23.57% and 11.22% for atenolol, metoprolol, medetomidine, propranolol, midazolam, and diazepam, respectively. Overall, these findings will benefit development and validation of further in vitro drug permeation experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16905298     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm        ISSN: 0939-6411            Impact factor:   5.571


  22 in total

Review 1.  Application of method suitability for drug permeability classification.

Authors:  Donna A Volpe
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Pitfalls and solutions in assaying anandamide transport in cells.

Authors:  Sergio Oddi; Filomena Fezza; Giuseppina Catanzaro; Chiara De Simone; Mariangela Pucci; Daniele Piomelli; Alessandro Finazzi-Agrò; Mauro Maccarrone
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 5.922

3.  In vitro tools for the toxicological evaluation of sediments and dredged materials: intra- and inter-laboratory comparisons of chemical and bioanalytical methods.

Authors:  Kathrin Eichbaum; Markus Brinkmann; Leonie Nuesser; Carolin Gembé; Marina Ohlig; Sebastian Buchinger; Georg Reifferscheid; Markus Hecker; John P Giesy; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Delivery of paclitaxel from cobalt-chromium alloy surfaces without polymeric carriers.

Authors:  Gopinath Mani; Celia E Macias; Marc D Feldman; Denes Marton; Sunho Oh; C Mauli Agrawal
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics and Dosing of Anti-infective Drugs in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Jennifer Sherwin; Travis Heath; Kevin Watt
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  High-throughput method for lipophilicity measurement.

Authors:  Zhi Chen; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Amiodarone Extraction by the Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuit.

Authors:  C Griffin McDaniel; C Cole Honeycutt; Kevin M Watt
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2021-03

8.  Analyte recovery in LC-MS/MS bioanalysis: An old issue revisited.

Authors:  Devendra Kumar; Nagsen Gautam; Yazen Alnouti
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.558

9.  Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies.

Authors:  Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez; Paulien Adriaanse; Annette Aldrich; Philippe Berny; Tamara Coja; Sabine Duquesne; Andreas Focks; Marina Marinovich; Maurice Millet; Olavi Pelkonen; Silvia Pieper; Aaldrik Tiktak; Christopher J Topping; Anneli Widenfalk; Martin Wilks; Gerrit Wolterink; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Jochem Louisse; Serge Rudaz; Emanuela Testai; Alfonso Lostia; Jean-Lou Dorne; Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-12-23

10.  Modeling error in experimental assays using the bootstrap principle: understanding discrepancies between assays using different dispensing technologies.

Authors:  Sonya M Hanson; Sean Ekins; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.