BACKGROUND: Research has shown that Hispanic women who speak mostly English have higher smoking rates than those who speak mostly another language. It is unknown how differences in smoking by English language use among adult Hispanic women in California have changed in recent years. METHODS: We compared current daily (100 or more cigarettes in lifetime, now smokes daily) and current nondaily (100 or more cigarettes in lifetime, now smokes some days) smoking prevalence for adult Hispanic women by English language use at home from population-based, random-digit-dialed California Tobacco Surveys in 1996 (n = 1406, 74% response rate [RR]); 1999 (n = 1379, 69% RR), and 2002 (n = 2912, 64% RR). RESULTS: Current smoking prevalence was at least twice as high among those who speak mostly English compared to those who speak mostly another language in every survey year (1996: 14.7% vs 6.1%; 1999: 14.6% vs 6.1%; 2002: 11.7% vs 4.9%) with the ratio staying constant (2.4:1). There was a decline in current nondaily smoking among those who speak mostly English by 2002 (1996 and 1999 prevalence: approximately 6%, 2002: approximately 4%), but no declines in current daily smoking for either language-use group. CONCLUSIONS: There has been no reduction in the English-language-use gap in smoking among Hispanic women in California. There has been a significant decline in current nondaily smoking prevalence among women who speak mostly English, but no significant reduction in current daily smoking for either language-use group. It appears that not much progress has been made in California in reducing daily smoking prevalence among Hispanic women at the population level. Smoking prevention and cessation efforts among Hispanic women remain a priority.
BACKGROUND: Research has shown that Hispanic women who speak mostly English have higher smoking rates than those who speak mostly another language. It is unknown how differences in smoking by English language use among adult Hispanic women in California have changed in recent years. METHODS: We compared current daily (100 or more cigarettes in lifetime, now smokes daily) and current nondaily (100 or more cigarettes in lifetime, now smokes some days) smoking prevalence for adult Hispanic women by English language use at home from population-based, random-digit-dialed California Tobacco Surveys in 1996 (n = 1406, 74% response rate [RR]); 1999 (n = 1379, 69% RR), and 2002 (n = 2912, 64% RR). RESULTS: Current smoking prevalence was at least twice as high among those who speak mostly English compared to those who speak mostly another language in every survey year (1996: 14.7% vs 6.1%; 1999: 14.6% vs 6.1%; 2002: 11.7% vs 4.9%) with the ratio staying constant (2.4:1). There was a decline in current nondaily smoking among those who speak mostly English by 2002 (1996 and 1999 prevalence: approximately 6%, 2002: approximately 4%), but no declines in current daily smoking for either language-use group. CONCLUSIONS: There has been no reduction in the English-language-use gap in smoking among Hispanic women in California. There has been a significant decline in current nondaily smoking prevalence among women who speak mostly English, but no significant reduction in current daily smoking for either language-use group. It appears that not much progress has been made in California in reducing daily smoking prevalence among Hispanic women at the population level. Smoking prevention and cessation efforts among Hispanic women remain a priority.
Authors: Karli K Kondo; Joseph S Rossi; Seth J Schwartz; Byron L Zamboanga; Carissa D Scalf Journal: J Ethn Subst Abuse Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 1.507
Authors: Terry A McNearney; Sonya E Hunnicutt; Michael Fischbach; Alan W Friedman; Martha Aguilar; Chul W Ahn; John D Reveille; Jeffrey R Lisse; Bruce A Baethge; Niti Goel; Maureen D Mayes Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 4.666