Literature DB >> 16904951

A randomised trial of the effects of an additional communication strategy on recruitment into a large-scale, multi-centre trial.

Helen Monaghan1, Anna Richens, Sam Colman, Rochelle Currie, Seham Girgis, Kathy Jayne, Bruce Neal, Anushka Patel.   

Abstract

Timely participant recruitment remains a significant challenge for most clinical trials. We evaluated the effects on participant recruitment of communication between the central trial coordinators and the clinical sites in the setting of a large international multi-centre clinical trial. The effects of communication were determined in a single-blind randomised controlled trial involving 167 clinical sites in 19 countries. Clinical sites were randomised to either additional or usual communication strategies - the additional communication group received a communication package based on additional, individually-tailored feedback about recruitment, in addition to the usual correspondence from the central trial coordinators that was provided to the control group. The two study outcomes were the median time to half randomisation target and the median total number of participants randomised per clinical site. Eighty-five clinical centres were randomised to receive additional communication and 82 to receive usual communication. At the conclusion of recruitment, there was no significant difference in the median number of participants randomised per centre between the additional and usual groups (37.5 vs. 37.0, p=0.68). The median time to half randomisation target was lower in the additional communication group compared to the usual group, however this difference did not achieve conventional levels of statistical significance (4.4 months vs. 5.8 months, p=0.08). The findings suggest that the additional communication strategy may be of some incremental benefit in helping sites achieve recruitment targets sooner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16904951     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  14 in total

1.  Comparing community and specialty provider-based recruitment in a randomized clinical trial: clinical trial in fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Robin R Whitebird; Donna Zimmaro Bliss; Kay Savik; Ann Lowry; Hans-Joachim G Jung
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 2.  Strategies designed to help healthcare professionals to recruit participants to research studies.

Authors:  Nancy J Preston; Morag C Farquhar; Catherine E Walshe; Clare Stevinson; Gail Ewing; Lynn A Calman; Sorrel Burden; Christine Brown Wilson; Jane B Hopkinson; Chris Todd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-29

3.  Testing a digitally distributed method to recruit a network of community organizations to fight the consequences of the drug epidemic: A study in 13 American states.

Authors:  Haesung Jung; Aashna Sunderrajan; Marta Durantini; Edgardo Sanchez; Liliane Windsor; Man-Pui Sally Chan; Thomas O'Brien; Bita Fayaz Farkhad; Alex Karan; Carol A Lee; Soonhyung Kwon; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2022-03-28

Review 4.  Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Patrina H Y Caldwell; Sana Hamilton; Alvin Tan; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ben Fletcher; Adrian Gheorghe; David Moore; Sue Wilson; Sarah Damery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan Cook; Cynthia Fraser; Elizabeth Mitchell; Frank Sullivan; Catherine Jackson; Tyna K Taskila; Heidi Gardner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-22

7.  SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a 'site visit' intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial.

Authors:  Valerie Smith; Mike Clarke; Cecily Begley; Declan Devane
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Does modification to the approach to contacting potential participants improve recruitment to clinical trials?

Authors:  Vinit Sawhney; Adam Graham; Niall Campbell; Richard Schilling
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-07-28

9.  Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Pauline Lockhart; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan A Cook; Monica Kjeldstrøm; Marit Johansen; Taina K Taskila; Frank M Sullivan; Sue Wilson; Catherine Jackson; Ritu Jones; Elizabeth D Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Researchers' and clinicians' perceptions of recruiting participants to clinical research: a thematic meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Lisa Newington; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.