Literature DB >> 16904449

Prostate-specific antigen-based serial screening may decrease prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Jason A Efstathiou1, Ming-Hui Chen, William J Catalona, David G McLeod, Peter R Carroll, Judd W Moul, Kimberly A Roehl, Anthony V D'Amico.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the preoperative characteristics, postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (DT), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) estimates after PSA failure in men diagnosed during a screening study versus a community referral population. A PSA-DT of less than 3 months is a surrogate endpoint for PCSM.
METHODS: From 1988 to 2002, 1492 of 9637 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent radical prostatectomy and experienced PSA failure. They were either participating in a screening study (n = 841) or attended 1 of 44 community-based practices (n = 611). The distributions of PSA, Gleason score, tumor stage, and PSA-DT were compared using chi-square metric. The estimates of PCSM after PSA failure were compared using Gray's P value.
RESULTS: Compared with the community population, the annually screened men experiencing PSA failure had a lower PSA level at diagnosis (5.1 versus 9.5 ng/mL, P <0.0001), were less likely to have Gleason score 7 to 10 cancer (25.1% versus 42.1%, P <0.0001), and were more likely to have low-risk disease (64.5% versus 23.8%, P <0.0001). Furthermore, the screened cohort had a reduction (P <0.0001) in the proportion with a PSA-DT of less than 3, 3 to 5.99, and 6 to 11.99 months and a significant increase in the proportion with a PSA-DT of 12 months or longer. After a median follow-up of 4.5 and 4.1 years after PSA failure in the screened and community cohorts, respectively, the PCSM estimates were lower (P = 0.0002) in the screened cohort (10-year estimate 3.6% [95% confidence interval 1.3 to 5.8] versus 11.3% [95% confidence interval 5.9 to 17.4]).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed by annual prostate cancer screening appeared more likely to experience an indolent PSA recurrence and less likely to die of prostate cancer after PSA recurrence compared with patients referred from the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16904449     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

1.  Racial differences in PSA screening interval and stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  William R Carpenter; Daniel L Howard; Yhenneko J Taylor; Louie E Ross; Sara E Wobker; Paul A Godley
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 2.  MR-guided prostate interventions.

Authors:  Clare Tempany; Sarah Straus; Nobuhiko Hata; Steven Haker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  The association between hypertension and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shah Navin; Vladimir Ioffe
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

4.  [The results of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC) 2012: confirmation or disappointment?].

Authors:  C Schaefer; L Weissbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Tumor markers in prostate cancer I: blood-based markers.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Axel Semjonow; Hans Lilja; Caroline Savage; Andrew J Vickers; Anders Bjartell
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  Frequency of Gleason score 7 to 10 in 5100 elderly prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Navin Shah; Vladimir Ioffe
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

Review 7.  Screening for prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Peter T Scardino; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.344

8.  Tumor volume, tumor percentage involvement, or prostate volume: which is predictive of prostate-specific antigen recurrence?

Authors:  Matthew A Uhlman; Leon Sun; Danielle A Stackhouse; Arthur A Caire; Thomas J Polascik; Cary N Robertson; John Madden; Robin Vollmer; David M Albala; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen testing in Japanese men on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Toshifumi Kurahashi; Hideaki Miyake; Masashi Shinozaki; Nobutoshi Oka; Atsushi Takenaka; Isao Hara; Yosuke Matsumura; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  An illustration of the potential for mapping MRI/MRS parameters with genetic over-expression profiles in human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robert E Lenkinski; B Nicolas Bloch; Fangbing Liu; John V Frangioni; Sven Perner; Mark A Rubin; Elizabeth M Genega; Neil M Rofsky; Sandra M Gaston
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.