Literature DB >> 16904278

Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.

Astrid van Wieringen1, Robert P Carlyon, Olivier Macherey, Jan Wouters.   

Abstract

Detection thresholds and most comfortable loudnesses (MCLs) were determined as a function of pulse rate for standard biphasic pulse trains (BP) and for anodic and cathodic monophasic phases alternating at fixed intervals (ALT-m). Three different phase durations were examined. With a 100-micros phase duration, thresholds for the ALT-m stimulus were substantially (up to 12 dB) lower than for the BP stimuli at relatively low rates (200 pps), but were similar to the BP thresholds at high rates (1000 pps). Thresholds for BP pulse trains decreased monotonically with increasing rate, whereas the function for ALT-m waveforms was non-monotonic with a maximum between 400 and 1000 pps. These trends occurred for three different cochlear implant devices, different electrode configurations, and, generally, for different phase durations (10.8, 25, and 100 micros/phase). However, at the shorter phase durations, thresholds remained lower for the ALT-m stimulus, even at 5000 pps, the highest rate studied. Dynamic ranges of the BP pulse trains increased with increasing rate, irrespective of the phase duration under test, but for the ALT-m stimuli this was only true at the shorter phase durations tested. At a 100-mus phase duration, dynamic ranges for the ALT-m waveforms did not differ significantly as a function of rate. The results confirm previous reports that delaying charge recovery, in this case by switching from a BP to an ALT-m wave shape, can substantially reduce thresholds [Van Wieringen, A., Carlyon, R.P., Laneau, J., Wouters, J., 2005. Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear. Hear. Res. 200, 73-86; Carlyon, R.P., van Wieringen, A., Deeks, J.M., Long, C.J., Lyzenga, J, Wouters, J., 2005. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 205, 210-224]. However, at high pulse rates, this advantage only occurs at short phase durations. In addition, we show that the complex interaction between the effects of pulse shape, rate, and phase duration on thresholds can be captured by the simple linear model described by Carlyon et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16904278     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

Review 1.  Auditory midbrain implant: a review.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-09

2.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

3.  Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms.

Authors:  Tiffany Elise H Chua; Mark Bachman; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effects of biphasic current pulse frequency, amplitude, duration, and interphase gap on eye movement responses to prosthetic electrical stimulation of the vestibular nerve.

Authors:  Natan S Davidovics; Gene Y Fridman; Bryce Chiang; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  A dual-process integrator-resonator model of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-13

6.  Assessing temporal responsiveness of primary stimulated neurons in auditory brainstem and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; William H Shapiro; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Morphometric classification and spatial organization of spiral ganglion neurons in the human cochlea: consequences for single fiber response to electrical stimulation.

Authors:  T Potrusil; C Wenger; R Glueckert; A Schrott-Fischer; F Rattay
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Forward-masking patterns produced by symmetric and asymmetric pulse shapes in electric hearing.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Astrid van Wieringen; Robert P Carlyon; Ingeborg Dhooge; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.