Literature DB >> 16903963

Characteristics of slow pathway conduction after successful AVNRT ablation.

Emoke Posan1, Lorne J Gula, Allan C Skanes, Andrew D Krahn, Raymond Yee, Basilios Petrellis, Damian P Redfearn, Uwais Mohamed, Paul A Gould, George J Klein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: AV node slow pathway conduction can persist following successful ablation for AV node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We hypothesized that careful examination of AV nodal conduction curves before and after effective AVNRT ablation in patients with persistent slow pathway conduction could shed light on this apparent paradox. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirty patients (age 40.9 +/- 14.3; 8 male) were included. AV node function curves were created based on pre- and postablation atrial extrastimulus testing. Analysis of slow pathway function curves demonstrated significant decrease in AH for any given coupling interval after ablation (mean difference -68.1 [-94.5, -41.7] P < 0.001), graphically indicated by downward displacement of the curve. In addition, mean slow pathway effective refractory period (ERP) increased from 247.9 +/- 36.1 msec to 288.6 +/- 56.0 msec (P < 0.001); mean maximum AH interval decreased from 361.3 +/- 114.2 msec to 306.9 +/- 65.2 msec (P = 0.013); mean difference in minimum and maximum AH interval during slow pathway conduction decreased (from 94.5 +/- 75.8 msec to 59.6 +/- 46.2 msec (P = 0.016). Finally, mean difference between the fast and slow pathway effective refractory periods, the span of coupling intervals over which slow pathway conduction occurred, decreased (from 113.9 +/- 61.4 msec to 63.2 +/- 41.5 msec, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Ablation, which successfully eliminates inducible and spontaneous AVNRT in the presence of persistent slow pathway conduction, is associated with significantly altered slow pathway conduction characteristics, indicating the presence of a damaged or different slow pathway after ablation, incapable of sustaining tachycardia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16903963     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00492.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  5 in total

Review 1.  Standardized review of atrial anatomy for cardiac electrophysiologists.

Authors:  Damián Sánchez-Quintana; Gonzalo Pizarro; José Ramón López-Mínguez; Siew Yen Ho; José Angel Cabrera
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  [Dual AV nodal nonreentry tachycardia (DAVNNT): unrecognized differential diagnosis with far-reaching consequences].

Authors:  Kiriakos Kirmanoglou; Christiane Peiker; Lukas Clasen; Dong-In Shin; Malte Kelm; Christian Meyer
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2014-05-16

3.  Outcomes in patients with dual antegrade conduction in the atrioventricular node: insights from a multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Jens Hartmann; Christiane Jungen; Sebastian Stec; Niklas Klatt; Stephan Willems; Hisaki Makimoto; Daniel Steven; Helmut Pürerfellner; Martin Martinek; Christian Meyer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Electrophysiological changes in the conducting properties of fast pathway following modification of the slow pathway of the atrio ventricular node for atrio ventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia.

Authors:  Imran Khan; Bakhtawar Shah
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Post-ablation prolongation of atrioventricular nodal refractory period is correlated with long-term success of cryoablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the case of the persistence of a residual jump.

Authors:  Joelci Tonet; Antonio De Sisti; Natalia Pardo Restrepo; Denis Raguin; Walid Amara; Manlio F Márquez; Philip Aouate; Xavier Waintraub; Faouzi Touil; Francoise Hidden-Lucet
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 1.900

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.