Literature DB >> 1690309

Prostate specific antigen in the staging of localized prostate cancer: influence of tumor differentiation, tumor volume and benign hyperplasia.

A W Partin1, H B Carter, D W Chan, J I Epstein, J E Oesterling, R C Rock, J P Weber, P C Walsh.   

Abstract

To evaluate the usefulness of serum prostate specific antigen in the preoperative staging of prostate cancer we examined tumor volume and differentiation, as well as benign prostatic hyperplasia volume to determine their influence on serum antigen levels. Serum prostate specific antigen was measured in 350 men with clinically localized prostate cancer and preoperatively in 72 men with documented benign prostatic hyperplasia. Although the mean antigen levels increased with advancing pathological stage, the usefulness of prostate specific antigen to predict pathological stage for an individual patient was limited: 1 of 102 men (0.9%) with prostate specific antigen levels of less than 2.8 ng./ml. had positive lymph nodes and 5 of 5 men with levels of greater than 100 ng./ml. had either seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement. However, for the majority of men (greater than 70%) with prostate specific antigen values between these 2 extremes the antigen levels did not accurately predict pathological stage. Because serum prostate specific antigen levels correlated with morphometrically determined tumor volume (r equals 0.535, p less than 0.01) they should, in fact, be predictive of pathological stage. However, most men with prostate cancer also have varying degrees of benign prostatic hyperplasia tissue in the gland producing prostate specific antigen. We have found that serum prostate specific antigen does not correlate with the volume of benign hyperplasia within the gland (r equals 0.21, p greater than 0.05). In addition, immunohistochemical studies have suggested that the lack of correlation between pathological stage and serum prostate specific antigen might be explained by a decrease in the production of antigen with increasing histological grade. Our findings of a negative correlation (r equals -0.37, p less than 0.01) between serum prostate specific antigen levels and Gleason score adjusted for tumor volume confirmed this suggestion. Consequently, serum prostate specific antigen levels do not reflect tumor burden and pathological stage accurately in individual patients for 2 reasons: 1) the unpredictable contribution from the benign prostatic hyperplasia component of the gland and 2) the decreasing production of prostate specific antigen by higher grade lesions as tumor volume increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1690309     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40079-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  57 in total

Review 1.  Methods for volume assessment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Corvin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Prostate cancers in men with low PSA levels--must we find them?

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Prostate mechanical imaging: a new method for prostate assessment.

Authors:  Robert E Weiss; Vladimir Egorov; Suren Ayrapetyan; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Prostate Cancer Risk-Associated Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Affects Prostate-Specific Antigen Glycosylation and Its Function.

Authors:  Srilakshmi Srinivasan; Carson Stephens; Emily Wilson; Janaththani Panchadsaram; Kerry DeVoss; Hannu Koistinen; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Mark N Brook; Ashley M Buckle; Robert J Klein; Hans Lilja; Judith Clements; Jyotsna Batra
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Evaluating radical prostatectomy specimens: therapeutic and prognostic importance.

Authors:  D G Bostwick; R Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 6.  Localised carcinoma of the prostate: a paradigm of uncertainty.

Authors:  S S Sandhu; A V Kaisary
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Age-specific PSA reference ranges in a group of non-urologic patients.

Authors:  A C Atalay; M I Karaman; S Güney; A Dalkiliç; A Y Müslümanoğlu; E Ergenekon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Early Detection of Cancer: Immunoassays for Plasma Tumor Markers.

Authors:  Danni L Meany; Lori J Sokoll; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2009-11-01

9.  Prostate-specific antigen density--a reliable parameter for the detection of prostate cancer?

Authors:  W F Thon; F Gadban; M C Truss; M Kuczyk; U Hartmann; U Jonas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chikezie O Madu; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.