Literature DB >> 16902941

The predicted 3D structures of the human M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor with agonist or antagonist bound.

Joyce Yao-chun Peng1, Nagarajan Vaidehi, Spencer E Hall, William A Goddard.   

Abstract

The muscarinic acetylcholine G-protein-coupled receptors are implicated in diseases ranging from cognitive dysfunctions to smooth-muscle disorders. To provide a structural basis for drug design, we used the MembStruk computational method to predict the 3D structure of the human M1 muscarinic receptor. We validated this structure by using the HierDock method to predict the binding sites for three agonists and four antagonists. The intermolecular ligand-receptor contacts at the predicted binding sites agree well with deductions from available mutagenesis experiments, and the calculated relative binding energies correlate with measured binding affinities. The predicted binding site of all four antagonists is located between transmembrane (TM) helices 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, whereas the three agonists prefer a site involving residues from TM3, TM6, and TM7. We find that Trp 157(4) contributes directly to antagonist binding, whereas Pro 159(4) provides an indirect conformational switch to position Trp 157(4) in the binding site (the number in parentheses indicates the TM helix). This explains the large decrease in ligand binding affinity and signaling efficacy by mutations of Trp 157(4) and Pro 159(4) not previously explained by homology models. We also found that Asp 105(3) and aromatic residues Tyr 381(6), Tyr 404(7), and Tyr 408(7) are critical for binding the quaternary ammonium head group of the ligand through cation-pi interactions. For ligands with a charged tertiary amine head group, we suggest that proton transfer from the ligand to Asp 105(3) occurs upon binding. Furthermore, we found that an extensive aromatic network involving Tyr 106(3), Trp 157(4), Phe 197(5), Trp 378(6), and Tyr 381(6) is important in stabilizing antagonist binding. For antagonists with two terminal phenyl rings, this aromatic network extends to Trp 164(4), Tyr 179(extracellular loop 2), and Phe 390(6) located at the extracellular end of the TMs. We find that Asn 382(6) forms hydrogen bonds with selected antagonists. Tyr381(6) and Ser 109(3) form hydrogen bonds with the ester moiety of acetylcholine, which binds in the gauche conformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16902941     DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.200600047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ChemMedChem        ISSN: 1860-7179            Impact factor:   3.466


  11 in total

1.  Prediction of the 3D structure and dynamics of human DP G-protein coupled receptor bound to an agonist and an antagonist.

Authors:  Youyong Li; Fangqiang Zhu; Nagarajan Vaidehi; William A Goddard; Felix Sheinerman; Stephan Reiling; Isabelle Morize; Lan Mu; Keith Harris; Ali Ardati; Abdelazize Laoui
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Predicted structures of agonist and antagonist bound complexes of adenosine A3 receptor.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Kim; Lindsay Riley; Ravinder Abrol; Kenneth A Jacobson; William A Goddard
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-04-12

3.  Prediction of the three-dimensional structure for the rat urotensin II receptor, and comparison of the antagonist binding sites and binding selectivity between human and rat receptors from atomistic simulations.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Kim; Youyong Li; Changmoon Park; Ravinder Abrol; William A Goddard
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Structure-based prediction of subtype selectivity of histamine H3 receptor selective antagonists in clinical trials.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Kim; Peter Fristrup; Ravinder Abrol; William A Goddard
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Microscopic binding of M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor with antagonists by homology modeling, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Huang; Guangrong Zheng; Chang-Guo Zhan
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Characterizing and predicting the functional and conformational diversity of seven-transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  Ravinder Abrol; Soo-Kyung Kim; Jenelle K Bray; Adam R Griffith; William A Goddard
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 7.  Potential adverse effects of bronchodilators in the treatment of airways obstruction in older people: recommendations for prescribing.

Authors:  Preeti Gupta; M Sinead O'Mahony
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Predicted 3D structures of olfactory receptors with details of odorant binding to OR1G1.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Kim; William A Goddard
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  The Repellent DEET Potentiates Carbamate Effects via Insect Muscarinic Receptor Interactions: An Alternative Strategy to Control Insect Vector-Borne Diseases.

Authors:  Aly Abd-Ella; Maria Stankiewicz; Karolina Mikulska; Wieslaw Nowak; Cédric Pennetier; Mathilde Goulu; Carole Fruchart-Gaillard; Patricia Licznar; Véronique Apaire-Marchais; Olivier List; Vincent Corbel; Denis Servent; Bruno Lapied
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Preferential binding of allosteric modulators to active and inactive conformational states of metabotropic glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Naveena Yanamala; Kalyan C Tirupula; Judith Klein-Seetharaman
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.