Literature DB >> 16902655

No clear winner in differing imaging modalities for cervical radiculopathy.

Joseph Fortin1, Dan W Riethmiller, Joel A Vilensky.   

Abstract

We review the literature pertaining to the strengths and limitation of myelography, computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relative to developing a diagnostic algorithm in the evaluation of cervical radiculopathy. To obtain the relevant literature, a Medline search was conducted using selected keywords and phrases. In addition, the bibliography of all retrieved articles was searched and pertinent articles were obtained and evaluated. The analysis revealed that developing a research based algorithm of imaging studies for the evaluation of cervical radiculopathy is not currently realistic. Furthermore, we found that most studies on the predictive value of imaging studies for cervical radiculopathy are outdated by more recent technology.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 16902655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  1 in total

1.  The Prevalence of Cervical Foraminal Stenosis on Computed Tomography of a Selected Community-Based Korean Population.

Authors:  Sangbong Ko; Wonkee Choi; Jaejun Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-11-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.