J A Burgers1, A Olijve, P Baas. 1. Nederlands Kanker Instituut-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, afd. Thoracale Oncologie, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam. s.burgers@nki.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience with an indwelling pleural catheter in patients with pleuritis carcinomatosa. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study. METHOD: The placement of an indwelling pleural catheter was considered as a treatment possibility for patients who presented with symptomatic accumulation of pleural fluid that returned following previous drainage or pleurodesis or when the fluid had not been drained off previously but there were strong radiological indications for a 'trapped lung'. The intervention was considered to be contraindicated by the following: dyspnoea that had not been reduced by previous pleural punctures performed for relief, dyspnoea caused by many different factors, a tendency for haemorrhaging that could not be corrected. The drain used was a Pleurx indwelling catheter, a thorax drain that is tunnelled subcutaneously, can remain in situ for a long time and offers the patient the opportunity to drain off fluid himself at any desired moment. RESULTS: In the period September 2003-May 2005, the treatment was considered in 40 patients. Ultimately, the catheter was inserted in 25 patients; the clinical deterioration of most of the other patients was too quick. Of the group, 33 patients (82%) died with a median survival of 70 days. All catheters functioned until they were removed or until the patient died. In 3 patients, the drainage procedure was complicated by empyema and in 1 patient by haemoptysis. From the total number of catheters, 9 were removed while the patient was still alive and in 6 patients, spontaneous pleurodesis occurred following 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, and 8 months respectively. In general, the patients were able to handle the catheter without problems and the symptoms were brought and kept adequately under control. CONCLUSION: The Pleurx indwelling pleural catheter was an efficacious treatment supplement for patients with malignant pleural effusion, in whom the standard pleurodesis was not effective.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience with an indwelling pleural catheter in patients with pleuritis carcinomatosa. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study. METHOD: The placement of an indwelling pleural catheter was considered as a treatment possibility for patients who presented with symptomatic accumulation of pleural fluid that returned following previous drainage or pleurodesis or when the fluid had not been drained off previously but there were strong radiological indications for a 'trapped lung'. The intervention was considered to be contraindicated by the following: dyspnoea that had not been reduced by previous pleural punctures performed for relief, dyspnoea caused by many different factors, a tendency for haemorrhaging that could not be corrected. The drain used was a Pleurx indwelling catheter, a thorax drain that is tunnelled subcutaneously, can remain in situ for a long time and offers the patient the opportunity to drain off fluid himself at any desired moment. RESULTS: In the period September 2003-May 2005, the treatment was considered in 40 patients. Ultimately, the catheter was inserted in 25 patients; the clinical deterioration of most of the other patients was too quick. Of the group, 33 patients (82%) died with a median survival of 70 days. All catheters functioned until they were removed or until the patient died. In 3 patients, the drainage procedure was complicated by empyema and in 1 patient by haemoptysis. From the total number of catheters, 9 were removed while the patient was still alive and in 6 patients, spontaneous pleurodesis occurred following 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, and 8 months respectively. In general, the patients were able to handle the catheter without problems and the symptoms were brought and kept adequately under control. CONCLUSION: The Pleurx indwelling pleural catheter was an efficacious treatment supplement for patients with malignant pleural effusion, in whom the standard pleurodesis was not effective.
Authors: James P Herlihy; Pranav Loyalka; Jayaraman Gnananandh; Igor D Gregoric; Carl G W Dahlberg; Biswajit Kar; Reynolds M Delgado Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2009
Authors: Lucía Ferreiro; Juan Suárez-Antelo; José Manuel Álvarez-Dobaño; María E Toubes; Vanessa Riveiro; Luis Valdés Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 2.409