Literature DB >> 16900451

[Effective, indicated--and yet without benefit? The goals of dementia drug treatment and the well-being of the patient].

Matthis Synofzik1.   

Abstract

Individual treatment decisions for patients with Alzheimer dementia are often characterized by uncertainty about the actual benefit that specific treatments or procedures may bring about. It often even remains unclear how the benefit of a treatment may be determined. In this paper, three criteria for determining the benefit of a treatment measure are developed: An intervention (1) must be effective and (2) able to achieve a clinically relevant goal, which is (3) desirable for the individual patient. By using example of anti-dementia drug treatment, it will by shown that even if standard goals of dementia care are achieved, the benefit for the patient may still be questionable. A cognitive improvement or a delay of cognitive decay may even harm the patient. Therefore it is not sufficient to focus on the efficacy of a drug and on general goals of care when making decisions about individual dementia treatments. Rather it is necessary to reflect and discuss explicitly the goals of the individual patient. As shown by various examples, this will facilitate coherent, patient-orientated treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16900451     DOI: 10.1007/s00391-006-0390-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0948-6704            Impact factor:   1.281


  20 in total

1.  Tube feeding and advanced progressive dementia.

Authors:  S G Post
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial.

Authors:  C Courtney; D Farrell; R Gray; R Hills; L Lynch; E Sellwood; S Edwards; W Hardyman; J Raftery; P Crome; C Lendon; H Shaw; P Bentham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Memantine for patients with Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Thomas E Finucane
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Quality of life in patients with Alzheimer's disease as reported by patient proxies.

Authors:  S M Albert; C Del Castillo-Castaneda; M Sano; D M Jacobs; K Marder; K Bell; F Bylsma; G Lafleche; J Brandt; M Albert; Y Stern
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Dementia and the goals of care.

Authors:  G A Sachs
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes.

Authors:  I B Wilson; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Future scenarios for the prevention and delay of Alzheimer disease onset in high-risk groups. An ethical perspective.

Authors:  S G Post
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Using rapid-cycle quality improvement methodology to reduce feeding tubes in patients with advanced dementia: before and after study.

Authors:  Carol Monteleoni; Elizabeth Clark
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-28

Review 9.  Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J S Birks; R Harvey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

10.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy does not prolong survival in patients with dementia.

Authors:  Lynne M Murphy; Timothy O Lipman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-06-09
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Tube-feeding in advanced dementia. An evidence-based ethical analysis].

Authors:  M Synofzik
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.214

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.