PURPOSE: The sequential addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to chemotherapy seems superior to its concurrent addition in patients with breast cancer. This study was conducted to clarify the hypothesis that there are differential interactions among TAM and chemotherapeutic agents. METHODS: Estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha-positive or -negative breast cancer cells were treated with 4-hydroxy TAM (4OHT), 5-fluorouracil (FU) and/or doxorubicin (Dox). Changes in the expression levels of genes related to sensitivity and resistance to TAM, 5-FU or Dox were tested. RESULTS: Concurrent treatment of 4OHT with 5-FU but not with Dox additively inhibited the growth of ER-alpha-positive cells. 5-FU did not change the expression levels of any tested genes related to either sensitivity or resistance to TAM. Although Dox did not change the expression levels of any genes related to the sensitivity to TAM, Dox significantly increased the expression levels of some genes related to TAM resistance, Eph A-2, ER-beta, Fos and vascular endothelial growth factor. 4OHT significantly decreased thymidilate synthase (TS) activity. CONCLUSIONS: Although the antitumor effect of concurrent 4OHT and 5-FU was additive, that of concurrent 4OHT and Dox was less than additive in ER-alpha-positive cells. The increased expression of genes related to TAM resistance by Dox might be responsible for the interaction. Decreased TS activity by 4OHT might increase the antitumor activity of 5-FU. These findings may provide a preclinical rationale for concurrent use with 5-FU and TAM.
PURPOSE: The sequential addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to chemotherapy seems superior to its concurrent addition in patients with breast cancer. This study was conducted to clarify the hypothesis that there are differential interactions among TAM and chemotherapeutic agents. METHODS:Estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha-positive or -negative breast cancer cells were treated with 4-hydroxy TAM (4OHT), 5-fluorouracil (FU) and/or doxorubicin (Dox). Changes in the expression levels of genes related to sensitivity and resistance to TAM, 5-FU or Dox were tested. RESULTS: Concurrent treatment of 4OHT with 5-FU but not with Dox additively inhibited the growth of ER-alpha-positive cells. 5-FU did not change the expression levels of any tested genes related to either sensitivity or resistance to TAM. Although Dox did not change the expression levels of any genes related to the sensitivity to TAM, Dox significantly increased the expression levels of some genes related to TAM resistance, Eph A-2, ER-beta, Fos and vascular endothelial growth factor. 4OHT significantly decreased thymidilate synthase (TS) activity. CONCLUSIONS: Although the antitumor effect of concurrent 4OHT and 5-FU was additive, that of concurrent 4OHT and Dox was less than additive in ER-alpha-positive cells. The increased expression of genes related to TAM resistance by Dox might be responsible for the interaction. Decreased TS activity by 4OHT might increase the antitumor activity of 5-FU. These findings may provide a preclinical rationale for concurrent use with 5-FU and TAM.
Authors: Davide Bedognetti; Mario Roberto Sertoli; Paolo Pronzato; Lucia Del Mastro; Marco Venturini; Paola Taveggia; Elisa Zanardi; Guido Siffredi; Simona Pastorino; Paola Queirolo; Giovanni Gardin; Ena Wang; Clara Monzeglio; Francesco Boccardo; Paolo Bruzzi Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Y Park; K Okamura; S Mitsuyama; T Saito; J Koh; S Kyono; K Higaki; M Ogita; T Asaga; H Inaji; H Komichi; N Kohno; K Yamazaki; F Tanaka; T Ito; H Nishikawa; A Osaki; H Koyama; T Suzuki Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 7.640