Literature DB >> 16900321

Tomato defense to the powdery mildew fungus: differences in expression of genes in susceptible, monogenic- and polygenic resistance responses are mainly in timing.

Chengwei Li1, Yuling Bai, Evert Jacobsen, Richard Visser, Pim Lindhout, Guusje Bonnema.   

Abstract

Oidium neolycopersici is a causal agent of tomato powdery mildew. In this paper, gene expression profiles were investigated of susceptible, monogenic- and polygenic resistant tomato genotypes in response to O. neolycopersici infection by using cDNA-AFLP. Around 30,000 TDFs (Transcript Derived Fragments), representing approximately 22% of the transcriptome based on in silico estimation, were identified and 887 TDFs were differentially expressed (DE-TDFs) upon inoculation with O. neolycopersici spores. Forty-two percent of the identified DE-TDFs were detected in both the compatible and incompatible interactions, a subset of these were studied for their temporal patterns. All of these common induced DE-TDFs displayed an expression peak at 7 days post incoluation in monogenic resistant response but sustained up-regulation in the susceptible and the polygenic resistant response. While more than half of these common DE-TDFs showed earlier timing in incompatible interactions compared to compatible interaction. Only 2% of the identified DE-TDFs were specific to either the monogenic or the polygenic resistant response. By annotation of the 230 sequenced DE-TDFs we found that 34% of the corresponding transcripts were known to be involved in plant defense, whereas the other transcripts played general roles in signal transduction (11%), regulation (24%), protein synthesis and degradation (11%), energy metabolism (12%) including photosynthesis, photorespiration and respiration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16900321     DOI: 10.1007/s11103-006-9008-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Mol Biol        ISSN: 0167-4412            Impact factor:   4.076


  22 in total

1.  cDNA-AFLP reveals a striking overlap in race-specific resistance and wound response gene expression profiles.

Authors:  W E Durrant; O Rowland; P Piedras; K E Hammond-Kosack; J D Jones
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Deductions about the number, organization, and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based on analysis of a large expressed sequence tag collection and selective genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Rutger Van der Hoeven; Catherine Ronning; James Giovannoni; Gregory Martin; Steven Tanksley
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 3.  Deciphering plant-pathogen communication: fresh perspectives for molecular resistance breeding.

Authors:  Kim E Hammond-Kosack; Jane E Parker
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.740

4.  Differential gene expression in individual papilla-resistant and powdery mildew-infected barley epidermal cells.

Authors:  Torben Gjetting; Timothy L W Carver; Leif Skøt; Michael F Lyngkjaer
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  The tomato powdery mildew fungus Oidium neolycopersici.

Authors:  H Jones; J M Whipps; S J Gurr
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 5.663

6.  Activation of a phytopathogenic bacterial effector protein by a eukaryotic cyclophilin.

Authors:  Gitta Coaker; Arnold Falick; Brian Staskawicz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Comprehensive transcript profiling of Pto- and Prf-mediated host defense responses to infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.

Authors:  Kirankumar S Mysore; Oswald R Crasta; Robert P Tuori; Otto Folkerts; Peter B Swirsky; Gregory B Martin
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  The transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana during systemic acquired resistance.

Authors:  K Maleck; A Levine; T Eulgem; A Morgan; J Schmid; K A Lawton; J L Dangl; R A Dietrich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Plant gene expression response to Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Authors:  R F Ditt; E W Nester; L Comai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The Medicago CDKC;1-CYCLINT;1 kinase complex phosphorylates the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II and promotes transcription.

Authors:  Katalin Fülöp; Aladàr Pettkó-Szandtner; Zoltán Magyar; Pál Miskolczi; Eva Kondorosi; Dénes Dudits; László Bakó
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.417

View more
  12 in total

1.  A novel mechanism of gall midge resistance in the rice variety Kavya revealed by microarray analysis.

Authors:  Nidhi Rawat; Neeraja Chiruvuri Naga; Sundaram Raman Meenakshi; Suresh Nair; Jagadish S Bentur
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.410

Review 2.  Large-scale tag/PCR-based gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Saeed Irian
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Recombination suppression at the dominant Rhg1/Rfs2 locus underlying soybean resistance to the cyst nematode.

Authors:  Ahmed J Afzal; Ali Srour; Navinder Saini; Naghmeh Hemmati; Hany A El Shemy; David A Lightfoot
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  The tomato Arp2/3 complex is required for resistance to the powdery mildew fungus Oidium neolycopersici.

Authors:  Guangzheng Sun; Chanjing Feng; Jia Guo; Ancheng Zhang; Yuanliu Xu; Yang Wang; Brad Day; Qing Ma
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 7.228

5.  Spatiotemporal patterns of induced resistance and susceptibility linking diverse plant parasites.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Mouttet; Ian Kaplan; Philippe Bearez; Edwige Amiens-Desneux; Nicolas Desneux
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Powdery mildew induces defense-oriented reprogramming of the transcriptome in a susceptible but not in a resistant grapevine.

Authors:  Raymond W M Fung; Martin Gonzalo; Csaba Fekete; Laszlo G Kovacs; Yan He; Ellen Marsh; Lauren M McIntyre; Daniel P Schachtman; Wenping Qiu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  The nematode resistance allele at the rhg1 locus alters the proteome and primary metabolism of soybean roots.

Authors:  Ahmed J Afzal; Aparna Natarajan; Navinder Saini; M Javed Iqbal; Matt Geisler; Hany A El Shemy; Rajsree Mungur; Lothar Willmitzer; David A Lightfoot
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Transcriptome analysis of the compatible interaction of tomato with Verticillium dahliae using RNA-sequencing.

Authors:  Guangxuan Tan; Kun Liu; Jingmin Kang; Kedong Xu; Yi Zhang; Lizong Hu; Ju Zhang; Chengwei Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  High-throughput genomics enhances tomato breeding efficiency.

Authors:  A Barone; A Di Matteo; D Carputo; L Frusciante
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  Down-regulation of acetolactate synthase compromises Ol-1- mediated resistance to powdery mildew in tomato.

Authors:  Dongli Gao; Robin P Huibers; Annelies Ehm Loonen; Richard Gf Visser; Anne-Marie A Wolters; Yuling Bai
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.