Literature DB >> 16900283

Parent and health professional perspectives in the management of adolescents with diabetes: development of assessment instruments for international studies.

Hilary Hoey1, Hannah M McGee, Michael Fitzgerald, Henrik B Mortensen, Philip Hougaard, Helle Lynggaard, Soren E Skovlund, Henk-Jan Aanstoot, Francesco Chiarelli, Denis Daneman, Thomas Danne, Harry Dorchy, Patrick Garandeau, Stephen Greene, Reinhard Holl, Eero Kaprio, Mirjana Kocova, Pedro Martul, Nobuo Matsuura, Kenneth Robertson, Eugen Schoenle, Oddmund Sovik, Peter Swift, Rosa Maria Tsou, Maurizio Vanelli, Jan Aman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of quality of life (QOL) in adolescents with diabetes requires patient, parent and health professional input. Psychometrically robust instruments to assess parent and professional perspectives are required. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Questionnaires concerning adolescent QOL were developed for completion by parents and health professionals. In an international study assessing QOL in 2,101 adolescents with diabetes (median age 14 years, range 10-18; from 17 countries including Europe, Japan and North America), parents and health professionals completed their respective questionnaires between March and August 1998.
RESULTS: Feasibility and acceptability of the new questionnaires were indicated by high questionnaire completion rates (adolescents 92%; parents 89%; health professionals 94%). Internal consistency was confirmed (Cronbach's alpha coefficients 0.80 parent; 0.86 health professional). Correlations of Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaire for Youths (DQOLY) scores with parent and health professional global QOL ratings were generally low (r ranging from 0.12 to 0.36). Parent-rated burden decreased incrementally across adolescence, particularly for girls. Professional-rated burden followed a similar profile but only after age 15 years. Until then, burden was rated as uniformly high. Clinically relevant discrepancies in parent and professional burden scores were noted for one-parent families and families where adolescents had been referred for psychological help. In both cases, health professionals but not one-parent families perceived these as high burden situations. The clinical significance of this relates to the significantly poorer metabolic control recorded for adolescents in both situations.
CONCLUSIONS: Parent and health professional questionnaires were found to have adequate internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity in relation to key clinical and QOL outcomes. The questionnaires are brief, easy to administer and score. They may also enable comparisons across countries and languages to facilitate development of international health outcome parameters. The inclusion of the parent and health professional perspectives completes a comprehensive assessment of adolescent QOL relevant to diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16900283     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-006-0042-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  19 in total

1.  Incorporation of quality-of-life considerations into intensive diabetes management protocols in adolescents.

Authors:  M P Golden
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Assessment of health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: an integrative review.

Authors:  L E Spieth; C V Harris
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  1996-04

3.  Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality-of-life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT). The DCCT Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Translation and linguistic validation of a disease-specific quality of life measure for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  A L Quittner; S Sweeny; M Watrous; P Munzenberger; K Bearss; A Gibson Nitza; L A Fisher; B Henry
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2000-09

5.  [Well-being of insulin-dependent diabetics. Evaluation of 100 adolescents and young adults in relation to their metabolic control].

Authors:  H Dorchy; S Olinger
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1997-10-11       Impact factor: 1.228

6.  The Pediatric Cancer Quality of Life Inventory: a modular approach to measuring health-related quality of life in children with cancer.

Authors:  M Seid; J W Varni; C A Rode; E R Katz
Journal:  Int J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1999

7.  Quality of life outcomes: measurement and validation.

Authors:  D F Cella
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.990

8.  Metabolic control and quality-of-life self-assessment in adolescents with IDDM.

Authors:  I Guttmann-Bauman; B P Flaherty; M Strugger; R C McEvoy
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Psychological adjustment and diabetic control.

Authors:  P Fonagy; G S Moran; M K Lindsay; A B Kurtz; R Brown
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  A short form of the Diabetes Quality of Life for Youth questionnaire: exploratory and confirmatory analysis in a sample of 2,077 young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  T C Skinner; H Hoey; H M McGee; S E Skovlund
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 10.122

View more
  2 in total

1.  Validation of the Diabetes Family Impact Scale: a new measure of diabetes-specific family impact.

Authors:  M L Katz; L K Volkening; C E Dougher; L M B Laffel
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.359

2.  Intensive insulin therapy in preschool-aged diabetic children: from multiple daily injections to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion through indwelling catheters.

Authors:  I Rabbone; A Bobbio; V Di Gianni; C Sacchetti; F Cerutti
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.256

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.