Literature DB >> 16899982

Frequency of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving epirubicin and docetaxel/paclitaxel with colony-stimulating growth factors: a comparison of filgrastim or lenograstim with pegfilgrastim.

Walter Schippinger1, Robert Holub, Nadia Dandachi, Thomas Bauernhofer, Hellmut Samonigg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) have been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of infections associated with antitumour chemotherapy. This report describes a single-centre experience of the efficacy of pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim or lenograstim in reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving combination chemotherapy with taxane and epirubicin in a neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting.
METHODS: A total of 118 patients with breast cancer were treated with either epirubicin 75 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) or epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks; 88 received G-CSF support with daily filgrastim or lenograstim and 30 with pegfilgrastim once per cycle.
RESULTS: Eight patients (9.1%) with prophylactic filgrastim or lenograstim support developed febrile neutropenia, as well as 1 patient (3.3%) in the pegfilgrastim group (p = 0.445). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 13 (2.7%) of 476 filgrastim or lenograstim supported chemotherapy cycles and in 2 (1.2%) of 172 cycles with pegfilgrastim support (p = 0.376). The frequency of chemotherapy delays and dose reductions was not significantly different between the two G-CSF treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: These data show a trend towards superiority of pegfilgrastim over filgrastim or lenograstim in reducing the frequency of febrile neutropenia in patients treated with taxane and epirubicin chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16899982     DOI: 10.1159/000094890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  10 in total

1.  Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of PegaGen® (pegfilgrastim) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a post-marketing surveillance study.

Authors:  Arash Jenabian; Ali Ehsanpour; Seyed Mohammad Reza Mortazavizadeh; Jahangir Raafat; Mohsen Razavi; Adnan Khosravi; Sharareh Seifi; Babak Salimi; Nassim Anjidani; Hamidreza Kafi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.359

2.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling of the novel human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor derivative Maxy-G34 and pegfilgrastim in rats.

Authors:  M Scholz; C Engel; D Apt; S L Sankar; E Goldstein; M Loeffler
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  Chemotherapy-induced anemia in breast cancer patients treated with pegfilgrastim-supported dose-dense regimens.

Authors:  Mariangela Manzoni; Sara Delfanti; Bianca Rovati; Donatella Grasso; Sara Mariucci; Katia Bencardino; Carmine Tinelli; Marco Danova
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  A pharmacokinetic model of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim application in normal mice and those with cyclophosphamide-induced granulocytopaenia.

Authors:  M Scholz; M Ackermann; C Engel; F Emmrich; M Loeffler; M Kamprad
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 6.831

5.  Adequate Neutrophil Responses and Non-Inferior Clinical Outcomes Can Be Achieved by a Two-Day Course of Low-Dose Filgrastim: A Retrospective Single Institution Experience.

Authors:  Raj Singh; Henry Heisey; Ahmed G Elsayed; Maria T Tirona
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-12-19

6.  Filgrastim prophylaxis in elderly cancer patients in the real-life setting: a French multicenter observational study, the TULIP study.

Authors:  Kamel Laribi; Delphine Badinand; Philippe Janoray; Khaled Benabed; Jean-Loup Mouysset; Elizabeth Fabre; Françoise Monchecourt; Rafik Diab
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Effectiveness of cytopenia prophylaxis for different filgrastim and pegfilgrastim schedules in a chemotherapy mouse model.

Authors:  Markus Scholz; Manuela Ackermann; Frank Emmrich; Markus Loeffler; Manja Kamprad
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2009-07-13

8.  Effectiveness of daily versus non-daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy: a multivariate analysis of data from current practice.

Authors:  D Almenar Cubells; C Bosch Roig; E Jiménez Orozco; R Álvarez; J M Cuervo; N Díaz Fernández; A B Sánchez Heras; A Galán Brotons; V Giner Marco; M Codes M De Villena
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.520

9.  Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia.

Authors:  Paul Cornes; Pere Gascon; Stephen Chan; Khalid Hameed; Catherine R Mitchell; Polly Field; Mark Latymer; Luiz H Arantes
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Comparison of the effects of pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on cytopenia induced by dose-dense chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ashrafi; Mehrzad Salmasi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 1.852

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.