| Literature DB >> 16899838 |
Shamus R Carr1, Joshua P Cantor, Atul S Rao, Thiru V Lakshman, Joshua E Collins, Joseph S Friedberg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite maximal ventilatory support, many patients die from hypoxia in the setting of potentially reversible pulmonary failure. There remains a pressing need for additional pulmonary supportive care measures, especially techniques that do not require systemic anticoagulation. The objective of our experiments was to determine whether systemic oxygenation could be increased in a large animal, with induced hypoxia, by perfusing the abdominal cavity with oxygenated perfluorocarbons.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16899838 PMCID: PMC7126298 DOI: 10.1378/chest.130.2.402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chest ISSN: 0012-3692 Impact factor: 9.410
Experimental Variables*
| Variables | Perfusion Medium | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saline Solution (n = 7) | Perfluorocarbon (n = 8) | ||
| Gender | 1.0 | ||
| Male | 1 (14) | 1 (13) | |
| Female | 6 (86) | 7 (87) | |
| Weight, kg | 49.4 ± 2.8 | 48.6 ± 2.1 | 0.51 |
| Flow rate, L/min | 2.0 ± 0.9 | 2.6 ± 1.2 | 0.28 |
| Volume in peritoneal cavity, L | 2.5 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 0.34 |
| Total volume, L | 8.4 ± 1.7 | 9.1 ± 0.4 | 0.33 |
Values are given as No. (%) or mean ± SD.
Properties of Perfluorocarbon
| Properties | Values |
|---|---|
| Specific gravity | 1.668 g/mL |
| Oxygen capacity | 50 volume% |
| Carbon dioxide capacity | 200 volume% |
| Boiling point | 132°C |
Figure 1Experimental design.
Observed and Fitted Pao2 Values for the Saline Solution and Perfluorocarbon Groups, by Oxygenation Circuit Condition and Fio2
| Fio2, % | O2 | Patients, No. | Saline Solution Group | Patients, No. | Perfluorocarbon Group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed | Fitted | Observed | Fitted | ||||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | 95% CI | Mean | SD | Mean | 95% CI | ||||
| 10 | Off | 5 | 26.6 | 2.8 | 22.7 | 17.0–28.3 | 7 | 28.0 | 5.3 | 25.7 | 20.6–30.7 |
| 12 | 6 | 31.3 | 3.3 | 33.7 | 29.0–38.4 | 8 | 37.1 | 8.1 | 38.5 | 34.3–42.7 | |
| 14 | 6 | 41.2 | 4.5 | 44.7 | 40.4–49.1 | 8 | 48.8 | 11.4 | 51.3 | 47.3–55.3 | |
| 16 | 7 | 57.6 | 4.9 | 55.7 | 51.0–60.5 | 7 | 63.7 | 7.9 | 64.2 | 59.7–68.6 | |
| 18 | 7 | 65.9 | 9.7 | 66.7 | 61.0–72.5 | 8 | 79.8 | 7.7 | 77.0 | 71.6–82.4 | |
| 10 | On | 5 | 28.6 | 3.9 | 25.6 | 20.1–31.1 | 7 | 36.7 | 8.4 | 35.2 | 30.2–40.1 |
| 12 | 6 | 31.3 | 4.1 | 33.2 | 28.9–37.4 | 8 | 43.8 | 4.8 | 44.5 | 40.8–48.3 | |
| 14 | 5 | 39.4 | 5.0 | 40.7 | 36.6–44.8 | 7 | 55.3 | 7.6 | 53.9 | 50.2–57.6 | |
| 16 | 5 | 46.2 | 5.8 | 48.3 | 43.2–53.4 | 7 | 64.4 | 8.2 | 63.3 | 58.5–68.1 | |
| 18 | 6 | 60.5 | 11.6 | 55.9 | 49.0–62.7 | 7 | 68.7 | 10.4 | 72.7 | 66.2–79.2 | |
Figure 2Perfluorocarbon vs saline solution with oxygenation circuit off and on. Data points represent observed measurements, while the lines are fitted.
Figure 3Perfluorocarbon vs saline solution with oxygenation circuit on.
Observed and Estimated Treatment Effect: Mean Pao2 Difference Between Perfluorocarbon vs Saline Solution, With Oxygenation Circuit on, for Different Fio2 Values
| Fio2, % | Observed Effect | Fitted | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | 95% CI | |||
| 10 | 8.1 | 9.6 | 3.3–15.9 | 0.005 |
| 12 | 12.4 | 11.4 | 5.9–16.9 | 0.001 |
| 14 | 15.9 | 13.2 | 7.8–18.6 | 0.001 |
| 16 | 18.2 | 15.0 | 8.9–21.1 | 0.001 |
| 18 | 8.2 | 16.8 | 9.4–24.3 | 0.001 |
| Overall | 12.8 | 7.4–18.2 | 0.001 | |
Figure 4Perfluorocarbon vs saline solution with oxygenation circuit off.