Literature DB >> 16899517

Untreated rejection in 6-month protocol biopsies is not associated with fibrosis in serial biopsies or with loss of graft function.

Eduard M Scholten1, Ajda T Rowshani, Serge Cremers, Frederike J Bemelman, Michael Eikmans, Erik van Kan, Marko J Mallat, Sandrine Florquin, Janto Surachno, Ineke J ten Berge, Ingeborg M Bajema, Johan W de Fijter.   

Abstract

Donor age, calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, and acute rejection are the most significant predictors of chronic allograft nephropathy. Protocol biopsies, both in deceased- and living-donor renal grafts, have shown that cortical tubulointerstitial fibrosis correlates with graft survival and function. The impact of not treating subclinical acute rejection (SAR) is less clear. In this study, 126 de novo renal transplant recipients were randomly assigned to receive area-under-the-curve-controlled exposure of either a cyclosporine or a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen that included steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and basiliximab induction. Protocol biopsies were taken before and 6 and 12 mo after transplantation. The prevalence of SAR was determined retrospectively. Fibrosis was evaluated by quantitative digital analysis of Sirius red staining in serial biopsies. Donor age correlated significantly with tubulointerstitial fibrosis in pretransplantation biopsies and inferior graft function at month 6 (rtau = -0.26; P = 0.033). Acute rejection incidence was 11.5%, and no clinical late rejection occurred. The prevalence of SAR at 6 mo was 30.8% but was not associated with differences in serial quantitative Sirius red staining at 6 or 12 mo, proteinuria, or progressive loss of GFR up to 2 yr. No differences were found in donor variables, histocompatibility, rejection history, or exposure of immunosuppressants. Controlled individualized calcineurin inhibitor exposure and subsequent tapering resulted in a low early acute rejection rate and prevented late acute rejection. Because, by design, we did not treat SAR, these results provide evidence that asymptomatic infiltrates in 6-mo surveillance biopsies may not be deleterious in the intermediate term. There is need for reliable biomarkers to prove that not all cell infiltrates are equivalent or that infiltrates may change with time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16899517     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2006030227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  21 in total

1.  Presence of FoxP3+ regulatory T Cells predicts outcome of subclinical rejection of renal allografts.

Authors:  Oriol Bestard; Josep M Cruzado; Inés Rama; Joan Torras; Montse Gomà; Daniel Serón; Francesc Moreso; Salvador Gil-Vernet; Josep M Grinyó
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Molecular diagnostics identifies risks for graft dysfunction despite borderline histologic changes.

Authors:  Petra Hrubá; Irena Brabcová; Faikah Gueler; Zdeněk Krejčík; Viktor Stránecký; Eva Svobodová; Jana Malušková; Wilfried Gwinner; Eva Honsová; Alena Lodererová; Rainer Oberbauer; Roman Zachoval; Ondřej Viklický
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Early loss of peritubular capillaries after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Floortje M E G Steegh; Marielle A C J Gelens; Fred H M Nieman; Johannes P van Hooff; Jack P M Cleutjens; Robert Jan van Suylen; Mat J A P Daemen; Ernst L W van Heurn; Maarten H L Christiaans; Carine J Peutz-Kootstra
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Early subclinical rejection treated with low dose i.v. steroids is not associated to graft survival impairment: 13-years' experience at a single center.

Authors:  Paolo Gigliotti; Danilo Lofaro; Francesca Leone; Teresa Papalia; Massimino Senatore; Rosita Greco; Anna Perri; Donatella Vizza; Simona Lupinacci; Giuseppina Toteda; Antonella La Russa; Roberto De Stefano; Francesco Romeo; Renzo Bonofiglio
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 5.  Kidney Fibrosis: Origins and Interventions.

Authors:  Thomas Vanhove; Roel Goldschmeding; Dirk Kuypers
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Angela C Webster; Lorenn P Ruster; Richard McGee; Sandra L Matheson; Gail Y Higgins; Narelle S Willis; Jeremy R Chapman; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

7.  Ciclosporin kinetics in children after stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  A J Willemze; S C Cremers; R C Schoemaker; A C Lankester; J den Hartigh; J Burggraaf; J M Vossen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Exploring genetic and non-genetic risk factors for delayed graft function, acute and subclinical rejection in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Dirk Jan A R Moes; Rogier R Press; Oliver Ackaert; Bart A Ploeger; Frederike J Bemelman; Cheikh Diack; Judith A M Wessels; Tahar van der Straaten; Meindert Danhof; Jan-Stephan F Sanders; Jaap J Homan van der Heide; Henk Jan Guchelaar; Johan W de Fijter
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Validating Early Post-Transplant Outcomes Reported for Recipients of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants.

Authors:  Vishnu S Potluri; Chirag R Parikh; Isaac E Hall; Joseph Ficek; Mona D Doshi; Isabel Butrymowicz; Francis L Weng; Bernd Schröppel; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Peter P Reese
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 10.  Surveillance biopsies in children post-kidney transplant.

Authors:  Patricia E Birk
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.