Literature DB >> 16899377

Contingency learning without awareness: evidence for implicit control.

James R Schmidt1, Matthew J C Crump, Jim Cheesman, Derek Besner.   

Abstract

The results of four experiments provide evidence for controlled processing in the absence of awareness. Participants identified the colour of a neutral distracter word. Each of four words (e.g., MOVE) was presented in one of the four colours 75% of the time (Experiments 1 and 4) or 50% of the time (Experiments 2 and 3). Colour identification was faster when the words appeared in the colour they were most often presented in relative to when they appeared in another colour, even for participants who were subjectively unaware of any contingencies between the words and the colours. An analysis of sequence effects showed that participants who were unaware of the relation between distracter words and colours nonetheless controlled the impact of the word on performance depending on the nature of the previous trial. A block analysis of contingency-unaware participants revealed that contingencies were learned rapidly in the first block of trials. Experiment 3 showed that the contingency effect does not depend on the level of awareness, thus ruling out explicit strategy accounts. Finally, Experiment 4 showed that the contingency effect results from behavioural control and not from semantic association or stimulus familiarity. These results thus provide evidence for implicit control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16899377     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  41 in total

1.  Strategic behavior without awareness? Effects of implicit learning in the Eriksen flanker paradigm.

Authors:  Rodica Ghinescu; Todd R Schachtman; Michael A Stadler; Monica Fabiani; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

Review 2.  Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

3.  Relative speed of processing determines color-word contingency learning.

Authors:  Noah D Forrin; Colin M MacLeod
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

4.  Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task.

Authors:  Miriam Tomat; Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Michael Sprengel; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 5.  Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

6.  Repetition or alternation of context influences sequential congruency effect depending on the presence of contingency.

Authors:  Nart Bedin Atalay; Asli Bahar Inan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-23

7.  Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Mark A McDaniel; Michael K Scullin; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Best not to bet on the horserace: A comment on Forrin and MacLeod (2017) and a relevant stimulus-response compatibility view of colour-word contingency learning asymmetries.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

9.  The magic of words reconsidered: Investigating the automaticity of reading color-neutral words in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Bianca De Wit; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.