Literature DB >> 16899328

Air quality impacts of power plant emissions in Beijing.

Jiming Hao1, Litao Wang, Minjia Shen, Lin Li, Jingnan Hu.   

Abstract

The CALMET/CALPUFF modeling system was applied to estimate the air quality impacts of power plants in 2000 and 2008 in Beijing, and the intake fractions (IF) were calculated to see the public health risks posed. Results show that in 2000 the high emission contribution induced a relatively small contribution to average ambient concentration and a significant impact on the urban area (9.52 microg/m(3) of SO(2) and 5.29 microg/m(3) of NO(x)). The IF of SO(2), NO(x) and PM(10) are 7.4 x 10(-6), 7.4 x 10(-6) and 8.7 x 10(-5), respectively. Control measures such as fuel substitution, flue gas desulfurization, dust control improvement and flue gas denitration planned before 2008 will greatly mitigate the SO(2) and PM(10) pollution, especially alleviating the pressure on the urban area to reach the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). NO(x) pollution will be mitigated with 34% decrease in concentration but further controls are still needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16899328     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  9 in total

1.  Cogeneration plant and environmental allergic diseases: is it really an eco-friendly energy source?

Authors:  Jinyoung Moon
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-12-02

2.  Study on the association between ambient air pollution and daily cardiovascular and respiratory mortality in an urban district of Beijing.

Authors:  Fengying Zhang; Liping Li; Thomas Krafft; Jinmei Lv; Wuyi Wang; Desheng Pei
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Heavy Metal Pollution and Ecological Assessment around the Jinsha Coal-Fired Power Plant (China).

Authors:  Xianfei Huang; Jiwei Hu; Fanxin Qin; Wenxuan Quan; Rensheng Cao; Mingyi Fan; Xianliang Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Long-term exposure to a mixture of industrial SO2, NO2, and PM2.5 and anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity.

Authors:  Naizhuo Zhao; Audrey Smargiassi; Marianne Hatzopoulou; Ines Colmegna; Marie Hudson; Marvin J Fritzler; Philip Awadalla; Sasha Bernatsky
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Intake Fraction of PM10 from Coal Mine Emissions in the North of Colombia.

Authors:  Heli A Arregocés; Roberto Rojano; Luis Angulo; Gloria Restrepo
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2018-07-29

6.  Health Effects of Energy Intensive Sectors and the Potential Health Co-Benefits of a Low Carbon Industrial Transition in China.

Authors:  Tingru Yang; Wenling Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Impact of Coal-fired Power Plant Emissions on Children's Health: A Systematic Review of the Epidemiological Literature.

Authors:  Eric Amster; Clara Lew Levy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Enhanced resistance to calcium poisoning on Zr-modified Cu/ZSM-5 catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3.

Authors:  Hongyan Xue; Tao Meng; Fangfang Liu; Xiaoming Guo; Shengdong Wang; Dongsen Mao
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.361

9.  Health benefits and control costs of tightening particulate matter emissions standards for coal power plants - The case of Northeast Brazil.

Authors:  Daniel B Howard; Jesse Thé; Rafael Soria; Neal Fann; Roberto Schaeffer; Jean-Daniel M Saphores
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 9.621

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.