Literature DB >> 16899295

The risk assessment-policy gap: an example from the UK contaminated land regime.

Jens Evans1, Graham Wood, Anne Miller.   

Abstract

Risk-based regulation assumes that risk assessment can evaluate risks against policy objectives. However, policy goals are often ambiguous and require risk assessors to interpret them for use in risk assessment. This risk assessment-policy gap stems partly from normative and imprecise policy language but is rooted more fundamentally in society's uncertain expectations for the environment. Until this uncertainty is resolved, the democratic and regulatory effectiveness of risk regulation will be undermined by ad hoc policy decisions abdicated to risk assessors.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16899295     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  11 in total

1.  Can science justify regulatory decisions about the cultivation of transgenic crops?

Authors:  Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Olivier Sanvido; Joyce Tait; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Using problem formulation to clarify the meaning of weight of evidence and biological relevance in environmental risk assessments for genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Karen Holt; Ian Kimber
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.074

4.  Problem formulation and phenotypic characterisation for the development of novel crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Protection goals in environmental risk assessment: a practical approach.

Authors:  Monica Garcia-Alonso; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 6.  Genetic basis and detection of unintended effects in genetically modified crop plants.

Authors:  Gregory S Ladics; Andrew Bartholomaeus; Phil Bregitzer; Nancy G Doerrer; Alan Gray; Thomas Holzhauser; Mark Jordan; Paul Keese; Esther Kok; Phil Macdonald; Wayne Parrott; Laura Privalle; Alan Raybould; Seung Yon Rhee; Elena Rice; Jörg Romeis; Justin Vaughn; Jean-Michel Wal; Kevin Glenn
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Expert opinion vs. empirical evidence: the precautionary principle applied to GM crops.

Authors:  Rod A Herman; Alan Raybould
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.074

8.  The Integration of Science and Policy in Regulatory Decision-Making: Observations on Scientific Expert Panels Deliberating GM Crops in Centers of Diversity.

Authors:  Karen E Hokanson; Norman Ellstrand; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  RNA Interference-Based Genetic Engineering Maize Resistant to Apolygus lucorum Does Not Manifest Unpredictable Unintended Effects Relative to Conventional Breeding: Short Interfering RNA, Transcriptome, and Metabolome Analysis.

Authors:  Chunmeng Huang; Zhi Wang; Pengyu Zhu; Chenguang Wang; Chaonan Wang; Wenjie Xu; Zhihong Li; Wei Fu; Shuifang Zhu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Policy-Led Comparative Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops: Testing for Increased Risk Rather Than Profiling Phenotypes Leads to Predictable and Transparent Decision-Making.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Phil Macdonald
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.