Literature DB >> 16897917

Does questionnaire format impact reported partner violence rates?: An experimental study.

Sherry Hamby1, David B Sugarman, Sue Boney-McCoy.   

Abstract

Researchers assess partner violence using numerous formats, but whether questionnaire format affects obtained rates has rarely been examined. We compared paper-and-pencil versus computer administrations, and standard Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) categories versus dichotomous (yes/no) response categories, in a 2 x 2 experiment with 160 undergraduate students. Differential validity was also examined for gender. Results provide some support for the use of all formats, although sexual coercion rates showed more measurement variability than reports of psychological aggression, physical assault, or injury. Sexual coercion effects also differed by gender. The standard CTS2 categories resulted in more disclosures than dichotomous categories for some variables. Differences between computer and paper-and-pencil formats were generally minimal. More attention to the effects of questionnaire design on disclosures of violence is urgently needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Violence Vict        ISSN: 0886-6708


  9 in total

1.  Discrepant Responding across Measures of College Students' Sexual Victimization Experiences: Conceptual Replication and Extension.

Authors:  RaeAnn E Anderson; Douglas L Delahanty
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2019-09-25

2.  Dating violence victimization and borderline personality pathology: Temporal associations from late adolescence to early adulthood.

Authors:  Salome Vanwoerden; Jacob Leavitt; Matthew W Gallagher; Jeff R Temple; Carla Sharp
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2019-03

3.  Centrality of control-seeking in men's intimate partner violence perpetration.

Authors:  M Pippin Whitaker
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2013-10

Review 4.  Addressing intimate partner violence with male patients: a review and introduction of pilot guidelines.

Authors:  Leigh S Kimberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Childhood Environmental Instability and Social-Emotional Outcomes in Emerging Adults.

Authors:  Sara Babad; Amanda Zwilling; Kaitlin W Carson; Victoria Fairchild; Valentina Nikulina
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2020-08-27

6.  Characterizing Pain and Generalized Sensory Sensitivity According to Trauma History Among Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jennifer Pierce; Afton L Hassett; Chad M Brummett; Jenna McAfee; Christine Sieberg; Andrew Schrepf; Steven E Harte
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-08-23

7.  Can nonresponse bias and known methodological differences explain the large discrepancies in the reported prevalence rate of violence found in Swedish studies?

Authors:  Johanna Simmons; Katarina Swahnberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The impact of modes of administration on self-reports of offending: evidence from a methodological experiment with university students.

Authors:  Hugo S Gomes; David P Farrington; Marvin D Krohn; Ana Cunha; Julia Jurdi; Bárbara Sousa; Diogo Morgado; Joseph Hoft; Elizabeth Hartsell; Leigh Kassem; Ângela Maia
Journal:  J Exp Criminol       Date:  2022-09-21

9.  Analysis of a Modification to the Sexual Experiences Survey to Assess Intimate Partner Sexual Violence.

Authors:  RaeAnn E Anderson; Samantha C Holmes; Nicole L Johnson; Dawn M Johnson
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2020-06-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.