Literature DB >> 16897912

Telephone survey respondents' reactions to questions regarding interpersonal violence.

Michele C Black1, Marcie-jo Kresnow, Thomas R Simon, Ileana Arias, Gene Shelley.   

Abstract

Concerns have been raised regarding the appropriateness of asking about violence victimization in telephone interviews and whether asking such questions increases respondents' distress or risk for harm. However, no large-scale studies have evaluated the impact of asking such questions during a telephone interview. This study explored respondents' reactions to questions regarding violence in two large recently completed telephone surveys. After respondents were asked about violence, they were asked if they thought surveys should ask such questions and whether they felt upset or afraid because of the questions. In both surveys, the majority of respondents (regardless of their victimization history) were willing to answer questions about violence and were not upset or afraid because of the questions. More than 92% of respondents thought such questions should be asked. These results challenge commonly held beliefs and assumptions and provide some assurance to those concerned with the ethical collection of data on violent victimization.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Violence Vict        ISSN: 0886-6708


  12 in total

1.  Prevalence of residential smoke alarms and fire escape plans in the U.S.: results from the Second Injury Control and Risk Survey (ICARIS-2).

Authors:  Michael F Ballesteros; Marcie-Jo Kresnow
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Attitudes about mental illness and its treatment: validation of a generic scale for public health surveillance of mental illness associated stigma.

Authors:  Rosemarie Kobau; Colleen Diiorio; Daniel Chapman; Paolo Delvecchio
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2009-03-28

3.  Medical Students' Perspectives on Trauma-Informed Care Training.

Authors:  Ellen Goldstein; Jann Murray-García; Andrés F Sciolla; James Topitzes
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2018

4.  Agreement on intimate partner violence among a sample of blue-collar couples.

Authors:  Carol B Cunradi; Melina Bersamin; Genevieve Ames
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2008-04-22

Review 5.  Adolescents' and adults' experiences of being surveyed about violence and abuse: a systematic review of harms, benefits, and regrets.

Authors:  Tracy McClinton Appollis; Crick Lund; Petrus J de Vries; Catherine Mathews
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Applying experience sampling methods to partner violence research: safety and feasibility in a 90-day study of community women.

Authors:  Tami P Sullivan; Enna Khondkaryan; Nancy P Dos Santos; Erica N Peters
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2011-02

7.  Impact of violence research on participants over time: Helpful, harmful, or neither?

Authors:  Sarah L Cook; Kevin M Swartout; Bradley L Goodnight; Tracy N Hipp; Alexandra Bellis
Journal:  Psychol Violence       Date:  2015-07-01

8.  Those harmed by others' drinking in the US population are more depressed and distressed.

Authors:  Thomas K Greenfield; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; William C Kerr; Yu Ye; Lauren M Kaplan
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2015-09-01

9.  Predicting the Effects of Sexual Assault Research Participation: Reactions, Perceived Insight, and Help-Seeking.

Authors:  Anne Kirkner; Mark Relyea; Sarah E Ullman
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2016-09-27

10.  Emotional risks to respondents in survey research.

Authors:  Susan M Labott; Timothy P Johnson; Michael Fendrich; Norah C Feeny
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.