Literature DB >> 16897417

Access to revascularization among patients with acute myocardial infarction in New York City--impact of hospital resources.

Jing Fang1, Abdissa Negassa, Robert W Gern, Michael H Alderman.   

Abstract

Timely revascularization can improve survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Identification of factors associated with increased use of revascularization in appropriate patients could improve outcomes. Using New York City hospital discharge records for 1988-1992 and 1998-2002, we determined revascularization rates for patients hospitalized with MI by neighborhood. Odds ratios for revascularization were estimated using a spatial model adjusting for neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics, while accounting for similarities in the rate of revascularization among geographically adjacent neighborhoods. Only 16 out of 112 New York City hospitals performed coronary revascularization. They were located in 14 of 41 neighborhoods. In general, patients living in neighborhoods with higher percentages of patients admitted to hospitals capable of revascularization service were more likely to be revascularized than those in neighborhoods with low percentages of patients admitted to hospitals with revascularization resources. This was true regardless of neighborhood availability of revascularization, after accounting for neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and patients' clinical status. Revascularization rates in New York City increased from 1988-1992 to 1998-2002 in every neighborhood and as a whole from 103 to 326 per 1,000 hospitalized AMI patients. This increase was not explained by the addition of new revascularization services. Thus, in New York City, where only certain hospitals can perform revascularization, efficient delivery of patients to hospitals with these resources appears to increase the likelihood of revascularization performance among AMI patients without increasing the number of new hospitals capable of revascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897417      PMCID: PMC3261287          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-006-9093-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  16 in total

1.  Inequalities in access to coronary angiography and revascularisation: the association of deprivation and location of primary care services.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; M Pringle
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Angioplasty vs thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative overview of the effects of interhospital transportation.

Authors:  F Zijlstra
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  F Zijlstra; J C Hoorntje; M J de Boer; S Reiffers; K Miedema; J P Ottervanger; A W van 't Hof; H Suryapranata
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  U Zeymer; K L Neuhaus
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Long-term MI outcomes at hospitals with or without on-site revascularization.

Authors:  D A Alter; C D Naylor; P C Austin; J V Tu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Race and sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S E Sheifer; J J Escarce; K A Schulman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Early and midterm results after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: which patient population benefits the most?

Authors:  Tobias Deuse; Christian Detter; Vicky Samuel; Dieter H Boehm; Hermann Reichenspurner; Bruno Reichart
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.676

8.  Is geography destiny for patients in New York with myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Jing Fang; Michael H Alderman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 9.  Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: six-month follow up and analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials.

Authors:  C Grines; A Patel; F Zijlstra; W D Weaver; C Granger; R J Simes
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Waiting times, revascularization modality, and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site revascularization facilities in Canada.

Authors:  David A Alter; Jack V Tu; Peter C Austin; C David Naylor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  2 in total

1.  The association between neighborhood socioeconomic status and clinical outcomes among patients 1 year after hospitalization for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Carolina Villanueva; Brooke Aggarwal
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-08

2.  Neighborhood Variation in Rate of Revascularization among Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients in New York City.

Authors:  Abdissa Negassa; Jing Fang
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 1.866

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.