Literature DB >> 16896833

In vitro cleaning efficacy and resistance to insertion test of interdental brushes.

Diana Wolff1, Daniela Joerss, Paul Rau, C E Dörfer.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the resistance to insertion forces and cleaning efficacy values of triangular interdental brushes (TIB) and conventional round interdental brushes (RIB). Extracted human teeth were fixed in a socket and matched to pairs simulating interdental spaces. Before and after standardized cleaning of the proximal surfaces, the pre- and postbrushing situations were registered with a digital camera. The cleaning efficacy was quantified by digital image subtraction. The forces necessary for insertion were measured with a load cell. The ratio between the relative cleaning efficacy and the forces necessary for insertion was calculated. The results of our study revealed that the relative cleaning efficacies of round and TIB were equal. There were no statistically significant differences. TIB showed significantly lower resistance to insertion values. Consequently, at identical resistance to insertion the TIB cleaned more effectively compared with the RIB, which means that the same effectiveness was reached by significantly lower forces at insertion. TIB showed a more favorable ratio between relative cleaning efficacy and resistance to insertion than RIB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16896833     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-006-0068-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  12 in total

1.  Dental floss ingestion requiring endoscopic retrieval.

Authors:  N Crain; B L Klein; P Mohan
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.454

2.  Recurrent dental floss laceration. Report of case.

Authors:  L E Lakind
Journal:  Temple Dent Rev       Date:  1975

3.  Cheilitis: analysis of 75 cases referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.

Authors:  S Freeman; R Stephens
Journal:  Am J Contact Dermat       Date:  1999-12

4.  In vitro-cleaning efficacy of interdental brushes with different stiffness and different diameter.

Authors:  Diana Wolff; Daniela Joerss; C E Dörfer
Journal:  Oral Health Prev Dent       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.256

5.  A comparison of proximal plaque removal using floss and interdental brushes.

Authors:  R D Kiger; K Nylund; R P Feller
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  Case report. Labial cervical abrasion caused by misuse of dental floss.

Authors:  A Rawlinson
Journal:  Dent Health (London)       Date:  1987 Jun-Jul

7.  Flossing clefts. Clinical and histologic observations.

Authors:  W W Hallmon; T C Waldrop; G D Houston; B F Hawkins
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  Efficacy of plaque-removal using interdental brushes and waxed dental floss.

Authors:  A Bergenholtz; A Olsson
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1984-06

9.  Gingival sequela from a retained piece of dental floss.

Authors:  H Abrams; R A Kopczyk
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.634

10.  Comparison of different approaches of interdental oral hygiene: interdental brushes versus dental floss.

Authors:  V Christou; M F Timmerman; U Van der Velden; F A Van der Weijden
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.993

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model.

Authors:  Hanna Boes; Sören Brüstle; Gholamreza Danesh; Stefan Zimmer; Mozhgan Bizhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  In vitro comparison of cleaning efficacy and force of cylindric interdental brush versus an interdental rubber pick.

Authors:  Christian Graetz; Kristina Schoepke; Johanna Rabe; Susanne Schorr; Antje Geiken; David Christofzik; Thomas Rinder; Christof E Dörfer; Sonja Sälzer
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.757

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.