Literature DB >> 16896780

Mechanisms of recovery and resilience of different components of mosaics of habitats on shallow rocky reefs.

Fabio Bulleri1, Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi.   

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms producing and maintaining discontinuities between patches in mosaics of habitats is necessary to predict changes in patterns of abundance and distribution of species. On temperate rocky reefs, physical and biological disturbance can result in a mosaic of patches of encrusting coralline, turf- or canopy-forming algae. We experimentally investigated the effects of disturbance within and at the boundary between these patches, in order to identify mechanisms accounting for re-colonisation of space and to assess whether the response of boundaries can alter the relative size of contrasting habitats. Also, we tested whether the resilience of the different types of assemblages depends on species richness (i.e. number of taxa present) of habitats or, alternatively, on other properties of systems like differences in life-history traits of dominating species. Although the nature of the mechanisms generating differences among habitats changed among different stages of the colonisation, local processes (within patches) prevailed over larger scale processes (among patches) in determining early patterns of colonisation of space in mosaics. By the end of the experiment, assemblages in clearings at boundaries had recovered to the undisturbed reference condition, in contrast to clearings within barren patches or algal turfs. Boundaries represent, therefore, relatively more stable components of the mosaic, with greater resilience than adjacent habitats. Although sea urchins are often indicated as the main force regulating the proportion of contrasting habitats on shallow rocky reefs, determining the nature of variation in the interaction between species dominating each type of habitat is crucial to understand dynamics of mosaics. Finally, our study provides evidence that resilience could not be entirely controlled by initial species diversity, suggesting that different proportions of dominant taxa could influence the stability of natural systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16896780     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0459-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Diversity-dependent production can decrease the stability of ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Andrea B Pfisterer; Bernhard Schmid
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems.

Authors:  M Scheffer; S Carpenter; J A Foley; C Folke; B Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems.

Authors:  S T Pickett; M L Cadenasso
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis.

Authors:  S Yachi; M Loreau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Increased macroalgal abundance following mass mortalities of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) along the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia.

Authors:  Robert Scheibling
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Community dynamics and ecosystem simplification in a high-CO2 ocean.

Authors:  Kristy J Kroeker; Maria Cristina Gambi; Fiorenza Micheli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Biodiversity loss and turnover in alternative states in the Mediterranean Sea: a case study on meiofauna.

Authors:  Silvia Bianchelli; Emanuela Buschi; Roberto Danovaro; Antonio Pusceddu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Epibenthic and mobile species colonisation of a geotextile artificial surf reef on the south coast of England.

Authors:  Roger J H Herbert; Ken Collins; Jenny Mallinson; Alice E Hall; Josephine Pegg; Kathryn Ross; Leo Clarke; Tom Clements
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.