Literature DB >> 16896772

Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental assessment of boundary permeability for the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita).

Virginie M Stevens1, Eric Leboulengé, Renate A Wesselingh, Michel Baguette.   

Abstract

Like other pond-breeding amphibians, the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) typically presents a patchy distribution. Because the species experiences high probabilities of local population extinction, its persistence within landscapes relies on both local and landscape-scale processes [dispersal allowing the (re)colonization of habitat patches]. However, the structure and composition of the matrix surrounding local populations can alter the dispersal rates between populations. As shown previously (Landscape Ecol 19:829-842, 2004), the locomotor performances of individuals at the dispersal stage depend on the nature of the component crossed: some landscape components offer high resistance to movement (high resistance or high viscosity components) whereas others allow high efficiency of movement (low resistance components). We now examine the ability of individuals to discriminate between landscape components and select low-resistance components. Our experimental study investigates the ways in which young natterjack toads choose from among landscape components common to southern Belgium. Toadlets (the dispersal stage) were experimentally confronted with boundaries between surrogates of sandy soils, roads, forests, agricultural fields and intensive pastures. Our results show: 1 the ability of toadlets to react to boundaries between landscape components, 2 differences in permeability among boundaries, and 3 our inability to predict correctly the permeability of the boundaries from the patch-specific resistance assessed previously. Toadlets showed a preference for bare environments and forests, whereas they avoided the use of agricultural environments. This pattern could not be explained in terms of patch-specific resistance only, and is discussed in terms of mortality risks and resource availability in the various landscape components, with particular attention to repercussions on conservation strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16896772     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0500-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  T H Ricketts
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes.

Authors:  S L Lima; P A Zollner
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Postmetamorphic dispersal and recruitment of first breeders in a Bufo calamita metapopulation.

Authors:  Ulrich Sinsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Gene flow and functional connectivity in the natterjack toad.

Authors:  Virginie M Stevens; Catherine Verkenne; Sofie Vandewoestijne; Renate A Wesselingh; Michel Baguette
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.185

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Evaluating the role of body size and habitat type in movement behavior in human-dominated systems: A frog's eye view.

Authors:  Mason Murphy; Michelle Boone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  The importance of habitat resistance for movement decisions in the common lizard, Lacerta vivipara.

Authors:  Susanne R K Zajitschek; Felix Zajitschek; Jean Clobert
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.964

3.  Experimental beetle metapopulations respond positively to dynamic landscapes and reduced connectivity.

Authors:  Byju N Govindan; Robert K Swihart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effect of railways on bird diversity in farmland.

Authors:  Joanna Kajzer-Bonk; Piotr Skórka; Maciej Bonk; Magdalena Lenda; Elżbieta Rożej-Pabijan; Marta Wantuch; Dawid Moroń
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Matrix quality and disturbance frequency drive evolution of species behavior at habitat boundaries.

Authors:  Amanda E Martin; Lenore Fahrig
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Influence of substrate types and morphological traits on movement behavior in a toad and newt species.

Authors:  Audrey Trochet; Hugo Le Chevalier; Olivier Calvez; Alexandre Ribéron; Romain Bertrand; Simon Blanchet
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.