Literature DB >> 16895724

A tree-based decision rule for identifying profile groups of cases without predefined classes: application in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.

Elias Zintzaras1, Maria Bai, Christos Douligeris, Axel Kowald, Panayiotis Kanavaros.   

Abstract

In this paper, we examined the utility of a forward growing classification tree as a supplement to cluster analysis for deriving a decision rule for the identification of profile groups when the cases do not belong to predefined classes. The technique was applied for the identification of low and high proliferation profile groups of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas according to the immunohistochemical expression levels of proliferation proteins. In a forward growing classification tree method, the size of the tree is controlled by the improvement (threshold value) in the apparent misclassification rate after each split. The classes used in the tree were defined using k-means clustering. The decision rule consisted of the splitting points of the split variables used. The methodology was applied to the histology data from 79 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Ten classes of individual cases were derived from k-means clustering. Then, a classification tree with a threshold of 2% was used to derive the decision rule. Branches at the left side of the tree consisted of individuals with a low proliferation profile and branches at the right side of the tree consisted of cases with a high proliferation profile. The classification tree, as a supplement method, not only identified but also provided decision rules for identifying profile groups. Finally, it also allowed for exploration of the data structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16895724     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2006.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  6 in total

1.  Derivation and validation of different machine-learning models in mortality prediction of trauma in motorcycle riders: a cross-sectional retrospective study in southern Taiwan.

Authors:  Pao-Jen Kuo; Shao-Chun Wu; Peng-Chen Chien; Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Yi-Chun Chen; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury after Liver Transplantation: Machine Learning Approaches vs. Logistic Regression Model.

Authors:  Hyung-Chul Lee; Soo Bin Yoon; Seong-Mi Yang; Won Ho Kim; Ho-Geol Ryu; Chul-Woo Jung; Kyung-Suk Suh; Kook Hyun Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  C-reactive protein to albumin ratio is a key indicator in a predictive model for anastomosis leakage after esophagectomy: Application of classification and regression tree analysis.

Authors:  Chen-Ye Shao; Kai-Chao Liu; Chu-Ling Li; Zhuang-Zhuang Cong; Li-Wen Hu; Jing Luo; Yi-Fei Diao; Yang Xu; Sai-Guang Ji; Yong Qiang; Yi Shen
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Prediction of Mortality in Patients with Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using a Decision Tree Classifier: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Trauma Registry System.

Authors:  Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Shao-Chun Wu; Peng-Chen Chien; Pao-Jen Kuo; Yi-Chun Chen; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Identification of Pancreatic Injury in Patients with Elevated Amylase or Lipase Level Using a Decision Tree Classifier: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Analysis in a Level I Trauma Center.

Authors:  Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Shao-Chun Wu; Peng-Chen Chien; Pao-Jen Kuo; Yi-Chun Chen; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh; Hang-Tsung Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Derivation and Validation of Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Acute Kidney Injury after Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Hyung-Chul Lee; Hyun-Kyu Yoon; Karam Nam; Youn Joung Cho; Tae Kyong Kim; Won Ho Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.