Literature DB >> 16895461

Changes in expectation consequent on experience, modeled by a simple, forgetful neural circuit.

Andrew J Anderson1, R H S Carpenter.   

Abstract

Our expectation of an event such as a visual stimulus clearly depends on previous experience, but how the brain computes this expectation is currently not fully understood. Because expectation influences the time to respond to a stimulus, we arranged for the probability of a visual target to suddenly change and found that the time taken to make an eye movement to it then changed continuously, eventually stabilizing at a level reflecting the new probability. The time course of this change can be modeled making a simple assumption: that the brain discounts old information about the probability of an event by a factor lambda, relative to new information. The value of lambda presumably represents a compromise between responding rapidly to genuine changes in the environment and not prematurely discarding information still of value. The model we propose may be implemented by a very simple neural circuit composed of only a few neurons.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16895461     DOI: 10.1167/6.8.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  9 in total

1.  Influence of environmental statistics on inhibition of saccadic return.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Casimir J H Ludwig; Lucy A Ellis; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Coupled Decision Processes Update and Maintain Saccadic Priors in a Dynamic Environment.

Authors:  Timothy Doyeon Kim; Mohammad Kabir; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Christoph Mathys; Jean Daunizeau; Markus Bauer; Jon Driver; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy.

Authors:  Harriet Feldman; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Context-gated statistical learning and its role in visual-saccadic decisions.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; Simon Farrell; Lucy A Ellis; Tom E Hardwicke; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08-15

6.  Inter-trial effects in visual pop-out search: Factorial comparison of Bayesian updating models.

Authors:  Fredrik Allenmark; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Counterfactual Reasoning Underlies the Learning of Priors in Decision Making.

Authors:  Ariel Zylberberg; Daniel M Wolpert; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Prediction and final temporal errors are used for trial-to-trial motor corrections.

Authors:  Joan López-Moliner; Cécile Vullings; Laurent Madelain; Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Humans adapt their anticipatory eye movements to the volatility of visual motion properties.

Authors:  Chloé Pasturel; Anna Montagnini; Laurent Udo Perrinet
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.