BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The CB2 receptor has been proposed as a novel target for the treatment of pain, and CB2 receptor agonists defined in in vitro assays have demonstrated analgesic activity in animal models. Based on its in vivo analgesic efficacy, AM1241 has been classified as a CB2-selective agonist. However, in vitro characterization of AM1241 in functional assays has not been reported. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In this study, AM1241 was characterized across multiple in vitro assays employing heterologous recombinant receptor expression systems to assess its binding potencies at the human CB2 and CB1 receptors and its functional efficacies at the human CB2 receptor. KEY RESULTS: AM1241 exhibited distinct functional properties depending on the assay conditions employed, a unique profile in contrast to those of the agonist CP 55,940 and the inverse agonist SR144528. AM1241 displayed neutral antagonist activities in FLIPR and cyclase assays. However, when cyclase assays were performed using lower forskolin concentrations for stimulation, AM1241 exhibited partial agonist efficacy. In addition, it behaved as a partial agonist in ERK (or MAP) kinase assays. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The unusual phenomenon of inconsistent functional efficacies suggests that AM1241 is a protean agonist at the CB2 receptor. We postulate that functional efficacies displayed by protean agonists in various assay systems may depend on the levels of receptor constitutive activities exhibited in the assay systems, and therefore, efficacies observed in in vitro assays may not predict in vivo activities. Published online 7 August 2006.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The CB2 receptor has been proposed as a novel target for the treatment of pain, and CB2 receptor agonists defined in in vitro assays have demonstrated analgesic activity in animal models. Based on its in vivo analgesic efficacy, AM1241 has been classified as a CB2-selective agonist. However, in vitro characterization of AM1241 in functional assays has not been reported. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In this study, AM1241 was characterized across multiple in vitro assays employing heterologous recombinant receptor expression systems to assess its binding potencies at the humanCB2 and CB1 receptors and its functional efficacies at the humanCB2 receptor. KEY RESULTS:AM1241 exhibited distinct functional properties depending on the assay conditions employed, a unique profile in contrast to those of the agonist CP 55,940 and the inverse agonist SR144528. AM1241 displayed neutral antagonist activities in FLIPR and cyclase assays. However, when cyclase assays were performed using lower forskolin concentrations for stimulation, AM1241 exhibited partial agonist efficacy. In addition, it behaved as a partial agonist in ERK (or MAP) kinase assays. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The unusual phenomenon of inconsistent functional efficacies suggests that AM1241 is a protean agonist at the CB2 receptor. We postulate that functional efficacies displayed by protean agonists in various assay systems may depend on the levels of receptor constitutive activities exhibited in the assay systems, and therefore, efficacies observed in in vitro assays may not predict in vivo activities. Published online 7 August 2006.
Authors: C C Jansson; J P Kukkonen; J Näsman; G Huifang; S Wurster; R Virtanen; J M Savola; V Cockcroft; K E Akerman Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: D Shire; B Calandra; M Rinaldi-Carmona; D Oustric; B Pessègue; O Bonnin-Cabanne; G Le Fur; D Caput; P Ferrara Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 1996-06-07
Authors: Steven J R Elmes; Maulik D Jhaveri; Darren Smart; David A Kendall; Victoria Chapman Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Alysia N Lozano-Ondoua; Courtney Wright; Anna Vardanyan; Tamara King; Tally M Largent-Milnes; Mark Nelson; Juan Miguel Jimenez-Andrade; Patrick W Mantyh; Todd W Vanderah Journal: Life Sci Date: 2010-02-20 Impact factor: 5.037
Authors: B B Yao; G C Hsieh; J M Frost; Y Fan; T R Garrison; A V Daza; G K Grayson; C Z Zhu; M Pai; P Chandran; A K Salyers; E J Wensink; P Honore; J P Sullivan; M J Dart; M D Meyer Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2007-11-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Elizabeth J Rahn; Alexander M Zvonok; Ganesh A Thakur; Atmaram D Khanolkar; Alexandros Makriyannis; Andrea G Hohmann Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2008-07-29 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Lirit N Franks; Benjamin M Ford; Toshifumi Fujiwara; Haibo Zhao; Paul L Prather Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 4.219