Literature DB >> 16893727

Consensus forum: worldwide guidelines on the critical care nursing workforce and education standards.

Ged Williams1, Shelley Schmollgruber, Laura Alberto.   

Abstract

This article explores the key themes, evidence, and arguments that inform the current position statements. It is acknowledged that future research, evidence, and practice experience may create the need to review and change these guidelines. Reform and refinement of the guidelines are inevitable; however, the current guidelines represent the best attempt yet to reach international consensus on what are appropriate standards to guide critical care nursing education and workforce requirements.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16893727     DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2006.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Clin        ISSN: 0749-0704            Impact factor:   3.598


  3 in total

1.  Factors Associated With Nurses' Knowledge of and Perceived Value in Evidence-Based Practices.

Authors:  Kristin Hittle Gigli; Billie S Davis; Jennifer Ervin; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Perceptions of Risk and Safety in the ICU: A Qualitative Study of Cognitive Processes Relating to Staffing.

Authors:  Danielle M D'Lima; Eleanor J Murray; Stephen J Brett
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  The Fifth International Survey of Critical Care Nursing Organizations: Implications for Policy.

Authors:  Ged Williams; Paul Fulbrook; Ruth Kleinpell; Laura Alberto
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.176

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.