Literature DB >> 16893698

Effect of everolimus-eluting stents in different vessel sizes (from the pooled FUTURE I and II trials).

Yoshihiro Tsuchiya1, Alexandra J Lansky, Ricardo A Costa, Roxana Mehran, Cody Pietras, Yoshihisa Shimada, Shinjo Sonoda, Ecaterina Cristea, Manuela Negoita, George D Dangas, Jeffrey W Moses, Martin B Leon, Peter J Fitzgerald, Ralf Müller, Hans Störger, Karl E Hauptmann, Eberhard Grube.   

Abstract

The everolimus-eluting stent (EES) has been shown to significantly decrease neointimal proliferation at 6 months compared with the bare metal stent (BMS) in patients with de novo coronary lesions. We report mid-term outcomes based on different vessel sizes in the combined FUTURE I and II trials. In the prospective, randomized, FUTURE I trial (single center) and expanded FUTURE II trial (multicenter), 106 patients (107 lesions) were randomized to EESs (n = 49 lesions) or BMSs (n = 58 lesions). Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on preprocedure reference diameter as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (small vessel < 2.75 mm, medium vessel 2.75 to 3.25 mm, and large vessel > 3.25 mm). At 6-month follow-up, EESs decreased in-stent late lumen loss (decreased rate range of 78% to 94%), resulting in significantly larger minimum lumen area as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (increased range of 34% to 42%) compared with the BMS across all vessel sizes. There were no cases of in-stent restenosis with EESs at any vessel size but 8 cases with BMSs (5 in small vessels). No stent thrombosis, aneurysm formation, or late stent incomplete apposition was observed in any group. The EES appears to be effective for treatment of de novo coronary lesions in decreasing neointimal proliferation at 6-month follow-up compared with BMSs, regardless of vessel size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16893698     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.02.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Long-term clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stent versus paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min Meng; Bei Gao; Xia Wang; Zheng-gang Bai; Ri-Na Sa; Bin Ge
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Everolimus-eluting stents: update on current clinical studies.

Authors:  Dominic J Allocco; Anita A Joshi; Keith D Dawkins
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2011-07-26

3.  Everolimus-eluting coronary stents.

Authors:  Alejandro Saez; Raul Moreno
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2010-09-13

Review 4.  Next-generation drug-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: focus on everolimus-eluting stent (Xience V).

Authors:  Imad Sheiban; Gianluca Villata; Mario Bollati; Dario Sillano; Marzia Lotrionte; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008

Review 5.  Everolimus-eluting stent platforms in percutaneous coronary intervention: comparative effectiveness and outcomes.

Authors:  Vasileios F Panoulas; Ioannis Mastoris; Klio Konstantinou; Maurizio Tespili; Alfonso Ielasi
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-07-24

6.  Vessel Size and Long-Term Outcomes After Limus-Based Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Focusing on Medium- and Small-Diameter Vessels.

Authors:  I-Chang Hsieh; Ming-Jer Hsieh; Shang-Hung Chang; Chao-Yung Wang; Cheng-Hung Lee; Chia-Hung Yang; Dong-Yi Chen; Ming-Lung Tsai; Chun-Chi Chen
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 3.619

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.