AIM: To study the relationship between respiratory/allergic disorders and chronic environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure to husband or at workplace among non-smoking women of a general population in Italy. METHODS: Analyses regard 2195 married or employed women. Information was collected through a self-administered questionnaire. ETS exposure was validated by salivary cotinine. RESULTS: Exposure both to husband and at work resulted a significant risk factor for current dyspnoea (odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-2.16), any shortness of breath at rest (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.83-4.30), recent wheeze (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.04-2.82), recent attacks of shortness of breath with wheeze (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.05-3.26), asthma diagnosis/symptoms (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.08), diagnosis of asthma or bronchitis/emphysema (obstructive lung diseases (OLD)) (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.40-3.58), current cough/phlegm (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.07-2.15), and rhino-conjunctivitis (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.94). Exposure only at work yielded higher adjusted odds ratios for all health conditions, except for rhino-conjunctivitis. Overall, about 24% of shortness of breath at rest, 16% of dyspnoea, 17% of rhino-conjunctivitis, 12% of OLD, and 10% of asthma diagnosis/symptoms are attributable to the effect of exposures to both husband and at work. Twelve percent of shortness of breath at rest and 10% of rhino-conjunctivitis cases might be avoided by eliminating exposure only at work and only to husband, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime ETS exposure, especially at work, is associated with respiratory symptoms/diseases, and it accounts for a sizeable proportion of such disorders. The combined effect of both exposures is higher than the separate effects.
AIM: To study the relationship between respiratory/allergic disorders and chronic environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure to husband or at workplace among non-smoking women of a general population in Italy. METHODS: Analyses regard 2195 married or employed women. Information was collected through a self-administered questionnaire. ETS exposure was validated by salivarycotinine. RESULTS: Exposure both to husband and at work resulted a significant risk factor for current dyspnoea (odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-2.16), any shortness of breath at rest (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.83-4.30), recent wheeze (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.04-2.82), recent attacks of shortness of breath with wheeze (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.05-3.26), asthma diagnosis/symptoms (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.08), diagnosis of asthma or bronchitis/emphysema (obstructive lung diseases (OLD)) (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.40-3.58), current cough/phlegm (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.07-2.15), and rhino-conjunctivitis (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.94). Exposure only at work yielded higher adjusted odds ratios for all health conditions, except for rhino-conjunctivitis. Overall, about 24% of shortness of breath at rest, 16% of dyspnoea, 17% of rhino-conjunctivitis, 12% of OLD, and 10% of asthma diagnosis/symptoms are attributable to the effect of exposures to both husband and at work. Twelve percent of shortness of breath at rest and 10% of rhino-conjunctivitis cases might be avoided by eliminating exposure only at work and only to husband, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime ETS exposure, especially at work, is associated with respiratory symptoms/diseases, and it accounts for a sizeable proportion of such disorders. The combined effect of both exposures is higher than the separate effects.
Authors: Suzy A A Comhair; Benjamin M Gaston; Kristin S Ricci; Jeffrey Hammel; Raed A Dweik; W Gerald Teague; Deborah Meyers; Elizabeth J Ampleford; Eugene R Bleecker; William W Busse; William J Calhoun; Mario Castro; Kian Fan Chung; Douglas Curran-Everett; Elliot Israel; W Nizar Jarjour; Wendy Moore; Stephen P Peters; Sally Wenzel; Stanley L Hazen; Serpil C Erzurum Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bernd Lamprecht; Mary Ann McBurnie; William M Vollmer; Gunnar Gudmundsson; Tobias Welte; Ewa Nizankowska-Mogilnicka; Michael Studnicka; Eric Bateman; Josep M Anto; Peter Burney; David M Mannino; Sonia A Buist Journal: Chest Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Eric Y Chen; Maria Garnica; Yung-Chen Wang; Alexander J Mintz; Chi-Shuo Chen; Wei-Chun Chin Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 9.400
Authors: Francine Laden; Yueh-Hsiu Chiu; Eric Garshick; S Katharine Hammond; Jaime E Hart Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 3.295