Literature DB >> 16893287

Contemplation of moral dilemmas eliminates sex differences on the Iowa gambling task.

William Overman1, Lee Graham, Alyssa Redmond, Rebecca Eubank, Laura Boettcher, Olga Samplawski, Katherine Walsh.   

Abstract

Men outperform women on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; A. Bechara, H. Damasio, D. Tranel, & A. R. Damasio, 1997). In this study, the authors show that sex differences are not due to differences in general emotional arousal or the abilities to calculate or reverse responses. Imaging studies have shown that, during the IGT, men increase activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and lateral orbital PFC, whereas women increase activity in the left medial orbital PFC. Deliberation of personal moral (PM) dilemmas also increases activity in medial and lateral dorsal PFC, whereas deliberation of moral impersonal (MI) dilemmas increases activity in lateral dorsal PFC. In the present study, men and women performed the IGT during PM, MI, or control deliberations. Deliberation of only PM dilemmas increased women's IGT performance to the level of men. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16893287     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.4.817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  20 in total

1.  Effects of dilemmas and aromas on performance of the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  William H Overman; Laura Boettcher; Lucas Watterson; Katherine Walsh
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Diurnal cortisol rhythm is associated with increased risky decision-making in older adults.

Authors:  Joshua A Weller; Tony W Buchanan; Crystal Shackleford; Arielle Morganstern; Joshua J Hartman; Jonathan Yuska; Natalie L Denburg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-06

3.  Reversal learning in gonadectomized marmosets with and without hormone replacement: are males more sensitive to punishment?

Authors:  Matthew LaClair; Agnès Lacreuse
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Negative mood induction normalizes decision making in male cocaine dependent individuals.

Authors:  María José Fernández-Serrano; Laura Moreno-López; Miguel Pérez-García; María I Viedma-Del Jesús; María B Sánchez-Barrera; Antonio Verdejo-García
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Sex differences in the functional lateralization of emotion and decision making in the human brain.

Authors:  Justin Reber; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) influences decision making under ambiguity and risk in a large Chinese sample.

Authors:  Qinghua He; Gui Xue; Chuansheng Chen; Zhonglin Lu; Qi Dong; Xuemei Lei; Ni Ding; Jin Li; He Li; Chunhui Chen; Jun Li; Robert K Moyzis; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 5.250

7.  Gender moderates the association between 5-HTTLPR and decision-making under ambiguity but not under risk.

Authors:  Scott F Stoltenberg; Joanna M Vandever
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Executive control deficits in substance-dependent individuals: a comparison of alcohol, cocaine, and methamphetamine and of men and women.

Authors:  Ellen A A van der Plas; Eveline A Crone; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Daniel Tranel; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.475

9.  Gender-related differences in moral judgments.

Authors:  M Fumagalli; R Ferrucci; F Mameli; S Marceglia; S Mrakic-Sposta; S Zago; C Lucchiari; D Consonni; F Nordio; G Pravettoni; S Cappa; A Priori
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-08-30

Review 10.  Let's call the whole thing off: evaluating gender and sex differences in executive function.

Authors:  Nicola M Grissom; Teresa M Reyes
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.