Literature DB >> 16893275

Three-month stability of delay and probability discounting measures.

Yu Ohmura1, Taiki Takahashi, Nozomi Kitamura, Paul Wehr.   

Abstract

Psychopharmacologists are interested in delay and probability discounting because the tendency to discount the value of future and uncertain rewards has been linked with drug dependency. However, relatively little is known about the long-term stability of discounting measures typically studied in clinical psychopharmacology. To evaluate the stability of discounting over a 3-month period, the authors compared points of subjective equality (indifference points) with those collected from the same subjects 3 months earlier. Seven delay periods, ranging from 1 week to 25 years, and 7 probability values, ranging from .95 to .05, were assessed in an undergraduate sample (n=22, delay discounting; n=18, probability discounting). The authors examined both differential stability (stability of individual differences) and absolute stability (stability of the group mean) of delay and probability discounting measures as well as their respective indifference points. The results demonstrate that standard delay and probability discounting parameters (e.g., hyperbolic k and area under the curve) had both differential stability and absolute stability across 3 months. Moreover, most indifference points in the delay and probability discounting tasks demonstrated both differential and absolute stability. All together, these results suggest that delay and probability parameters are stable enough to predict future behavior, such as substance abuse. Additional findings indicated that a hyperbolic function fitted the data better than an exponential function and that delay and probability discounting parameters were not significantly correlated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16893275     DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.14.3.318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  85 in total

1.  Temporal stability of a cigarette purchase task.

Authors:  Lauren R Few; John Acker; Cara Murphy; James MacKillop
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  DAT1 and COMT effects on delay discounting and trait impulsivity in male adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and healthy controls.

Authors:  Yannis Paloyelis; Philip Asherson; Mitul A Mehta; Stephen V Faraone; Jonna Kuntsi
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Heritability of delay discounting in adolescence: a longitudinal twin study.

Authors:  Andrey P Anokhin; Simon Golosheykin; Julia D Grant; Andrew C Heath
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Assessment of risk-taking and impulsive behaviors: A comparison between three tasks.

Authors:  Sihua Xu; Marc Korczykowski; Senhua Zhu; Hengyi Rao
Journal:  Soc Behav Pers       Date:  2013

Review 5.  Toward an animal model of gambling: delay discounting and the allure of unpredictable outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Eric E Ewan; Carla H Lagorio
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2006-12-15

6.  Alternate versions of a fixed-choice, delay-discounting assessment for repeated-measures designs.

Authors:  Jinyi Kuang; Hannah Milhorn; Allison Stuppy-Sullivan; Soyeon Jung; Richard Yi
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Working memory ability predicts trajectories of early alcohol use in adolescents: the mediational role of impulsivity.

Authors:  Atika Khurana; Dan Romer; Laura M Betancourt; Nancy L Brodsky; Joan M Giannetta; Hallam Hurt
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Measurement of impulsive choice in rats: same- and alternate-form test-retest reliability and temporal tracking.

Authors:  Jennifer R Peterson; Catherine C Hill; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Mechanisms of Individual Differences in Impulsive and Risky Choice in Rats.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

10.  Test-retest reliability of behavioral measures of impulsive choice, impulsive action, and inattention.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Matthew J Baggott; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.